When the water is over the gunn’els …

The Washington Times calls for Dennis Hastert’s resignation.
Blizzard hits Hades.

… follow the rats.

The Washington Times has just called for Dennis Hastert’s head.

The facts of the disgrace of Mark Foley, who was a Republican member of the House from a Florida district until he resigned last week, constitute a disgrace for every Republican member of Congress. Red flags emerged in late 2005, perhaps even earlier, in suggestive and wholly inappropriate e-mail messages to underage congressional pages. His aberrant, predatory — and possibly criminal — behavior was an open secret among the pages who were his prey. The evidence was strong enough long enough ago that the speaker should have relieved Mr. Foley of his committee responsibilities contingent on a full investigation to learn what had taken place, whether any laws had been violated and what action, up to and including prosecution, were warranted by the facts. This never happened.

Rep. John Shimkus of Illinois, the Republican chairman of the House Page Board, said he learned about the Foley e-mail messages “in late 2005.” Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the leader of the Republican majority, said he was informed of the e-mail messages earlier this year. On Friday, Mr. Hastert dissembled, to put it charitably, before conceding that he, too, learned about the e-mail messages sometime earlier this year. Late yesterday afternoon, Mr. Hastert insisted that he learned of the most flagrant instant-message exchange from 2003 only last Friday, when it was reported by ABC News. This is irrelevant. The original e-mail messages were warning enough that a predator — and, incredibly, the co-chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children — could be prowling the halls of Congress. The matter wasn’t pursued aggressively. It was barely pursued at all. Moreover, all available evidence suggests that the Republican leadership did not share anything related to this matter with any Democrat.

Now the scandal must unfold on the front pages of the newspapers and on the television screens, as transcripts of lewd messages emerge and doubts are rightly raised about the forthrightness of the Republican stewards of the 109th Congress. Some Democrats are attempting to make this “a Republican scandal,” and they shouldn’t; Democrats have contributed more than their share of characters in the tawdry history of congressional sexual scandals. Sexual predators come in all shapes, sizes and partisan hues, in institutions within and without government. When predators are found they must be dealt with, forcefully and swiftly. This time the offender is a Republican, and Republicans can’t simply “get ahead” of the scandal by competing to make the most noise in calls for a full investigation. The time for that is long past.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once. Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week’s revelations — or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away. He gave phony answers Friday to the old and ever-relevant questions of what did he know and when did he know it? Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance.

[Emphasis added.]


1. As JFK said when the Wall Street Journal editorial page attacked Richard Nixon, “That’s like L’Osservatore Romano criticizing the Pope.”

2. Either Hastert resigns, or he doesn’t resign. (Who says Aristotle doesn’t come in handy every once in a while?) Either way, the story is going to have legs.

3. Tony Snow, Hinderaker and the other right-wing kool-aid drinkers who have been downplaying the scandal look remarkably silly.

The Washington Times misses only one trick, as far as I can see. Part of Hastert’s defense, as offered by the usual apologists, is that he couldn’t have ordered an investigation without risking charges of homophobia. (And you know how terrified Republican conservatives are of that charge.) Or, alternatively, that since the Louisiana recipient’s parents didn’t want to press the matter, nothing could have been done.

Horsepuckey! All Hastert or Shimkus had to do was call current and former pages, one at a time, and ask, under a promise of confidentiality, “Are you aware of any improper contact between Members of Congress and pages?” No need to mention Foley by name. What are the odds that none of them would have spoken up? As it turns out, of course, even that wouldn’t have been necessary. All they had to do was ask the supervisors in the Page Office, who apparently knew enough to warn the kids away from Foley.

Author: Mark Kleiman

Professor of Public Policy at the NYU Marron Institute for Urban Management and editor of the Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. Teaches about the methods of policy analysis about drug abuse control and crime control policy, working out the implications of two principles: that swift and certain sanctions don't have to be severe to be effective, and that well-designed threats usually don't have to be carried out. Books: Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (with Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken) When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment (Princeton, 2009; named one of the "books of the year" by The Economist Against Excess: Drug Policy for Results (Basic, 1993) Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control (Greenwood, 1989) UCLA Homepage Curriculum Vitae Contact: Markarkleiman-at-gmail.com

2 thoughts on “When the water is over the gunn’els …”

  1. It doesn't matter if the parents want to press charges or not. The laws protecting children do not require parental involvement.

  2. "Are you aware of any improper contact between Members of Congress and pages?"
    No, they could not have asked that. Too open ended. The buzz is that Foley was not the only predator. You can't have the pages identifying multiple GOP congressmen.

Comments are closed.