Rise, comrades, from your slumber! A rousing film of the people awaits you this weekend! Ok, maybe not. But at least itâ€™ll give you a good chuckle. This weekâ€™s movie recommendation is Jacob Tierneyâ€™s recent offbeat independent Canadian film The Trotsky (2009).
Leon Bronstein, played by the stoner-comedy staple Jay Baruchel, is a quirky high school student in Montreal. Heâ€™s a bright kid with a peculiar dress sense, theatrical flair, and fervid empathy with the plight of the worker. Understandable, really, when you consider that heâ€™s the re-incarnation of Leon Trotsky. Ok, again, maybe not. But even if his belief is misplaced, he certainly takes it seriously: he takes his impassioned effort to cultivate class consciousness to the oppressed laborers at the local factory, where he hopes to organize a hunger strike.
Thereâ€™s a small hitch. Leonâ€™s dad (played by Saul Rubinek) is the oppressive factory owner from whom Leon petitions for the liberation of the workers. When the hunger strike barely crosses over from nuisance to inconvenience, dad sees a teachable moment. He pulls Leon from his plush private school and enrolls him in public school. This is all for the best, as it gives young Leon a ripe opportunity to sharpen his wits against the oppressive regime of Principal Berkhoff, played by Colm Feore, who sports an uncanny resemblance to Lenin. The rest of the film is about Leonâ€™s efforts to rise to the occasion for which he feels destined, and this includes unionizing the school pupils, falling in love with an older woman named Alexandra, and hopefully being exiled from his home.
Part of the comic conceit is that young Leonâ€™s efforts to emulate the life of the real Trotsky so obviously take priority above actually making good on the promises Trotsky might have made â€“ when allâ€™s said and done, if thereâ€™s a choice between gaining publicity for himself and liberating the oppressed, Leon seems to care more about the former than the latter.
Nonetheless, one of the heartwarming take-away messages is that the difference between boredom and apathy â€“ the accurate diagnosis of which preoccupies much of Leonâ€™s interactions with his fellow schoolmates â€“ is that between people who are either yet to be roused to action, or those who cannot be so roused. If boredom is the affliction, then Leon fancies himself as the man capable of delivering the necessary message. And while Leonâ€™s efforts throughout the film certainly seem self-indulgently theatrical, thereâ€™s a charm in his fanciful charade. For this, the role of Professor McGovern (played by Michael Murphy), a political theorist whoâ€™s wistfully nostalgic for his days of agitation at Berkeley in the â€˜60s, is a useful foil: by the end of the film, the older characters are forced to wonder when they decided that the kind of futile idealism that Leon characterizes switched from something they encouraged to something they now view as pie-in-the-sky petty insurrection.
Part of the fun in a film such as this is placing the references: some of them are straightforward (Trotskyâ€™s search for an intellectual soul-mate by the name of Vladimir who will fill the role of his Lenin), while others are less so (the positioning of the characters is sometimes a little artificial, and held just long enough to evoke a propaganda poster). But the film does a good job of playing to different audiences with varying levels of familiarity with Trotsky lore. The lower threshold of audience familiarity with communist history is set invitingly low to ensure that only very few people will feel left out. If youâ€™re one of those people whose knowledge of the real Trotskyâ€™s life extends only as far as â€˜something about a czarâ€™ and â€˜something else about a pick-axe,â€™ donâ€™t worry: the bulk of the rest is covered within the film itself. There are, however, plenty of inside gags for those with more than merely a passing interest (a recurring nightmare of Leonâ€™s, usually stimulated by some interaction in which another character has made him feel infantilized, is a nice witty reference to Battleship Potemkin). But there are plenty of base guffaws littered throughout to keep anyone entertained.
The supporting cast is wonderful, with particular highlights from Leonâ€™s father and Principal Berkhoff. Sure, itâ€™s a high school comedy, but the audience extends far beyond the usual stoner crowd that forms the main draw for most films of that ilk and for which Baruchel often appears as a principal character.
3 thoughts on “Weekend Film Recommendation: The Trotsky”
Hi Johann — Intriguing choice. I'd rate this one as a near miss. I liked the performances a lot, but don't think the premise and overall execution could sustain the film's nearly two hour length.
That's fair. It could — and maybe should — have been about twenty minutes shorter. Perhaps I awarded extra points for the film's having more layers than anticipated from the Baruchel stoner-comedy stable.
Some films have a very particular sweet spot where viewers of a particular age and sensibility are entranced. An example for me is Twilight http://www.samefacts.com/2013/03/everything-else/… I loved it but it did not grab a broad audience.
I am not in the sweet spot for The Trotsky, but I can easily see how this could become a cult favorite for years to come. It had to be intimidating to produce in that it is in some respects is a typical teenager vs. authority comedy with some first love stuff thrown in yet it also depends on knowing who Trotsky was and what happened to him. Most of today’s teenagers would not know much about Trotsky and many adults knowledgeable about Trotsky would not necessarily find fresh the teen comedy aspects, yet for those in the overlap in the Venn diagram, quite a film. Napolean Dynamite, which I loved, was aiming for a similar target although in my opinion hit it better.
Comments are closed.