Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
Here is Dan’s Research Brief. Here is the lead; “Trying to summarize the fiscal difficulties of California in a short essay is a Mission Impossible since what has gone wrong is inherently a complicated tale.”
Comments are closed.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
To the extent I understood them, I like the suggestions on clarifying our accounting vocabulary *very* much. Anything that can be done to make our budget situation clearer would be helpful. It really should be taught in high school. And if we can’t get high school students to understand it, then we are too complex and need to simplify. And I do think it makes the problems seem more manageable.
The idea of making the governor’s budget the rule if the Leg can’t pass anything better is very interesting too. I need to think about it more.
But, I think the 2/3rds super-majority thing is what kills us. It is just too tempting for the Republicans to try to jack the rest of us. As we see, very few of them can resist. We’ve already cut into muscle (services poor people desperately need, and our schools) and what do we get from them? Nothing, pretty much.
Which brings me to another Brown proposal not discussed here. He wants to give local governments more power and I think he’s onto something. If the red county folk want to go back to dirt roads and septic tanks, I think they should be allowed to do that, if they win locally. It’s still a free country, sort of. I just think they should stop trying to force it on the rest of us.
The essential problem is that you can spend money with 50% and pass taxes with 2/3. I am not super wedded to any particular threshold (55% or even 60% might be ok) *so long as the spending and taxing threshold is the same*.
Just out of curiosity, why is 55% better than 51%? We can always undo something at the next election.
I said I’m not wedded to any particular percentage.
But as far as undoing something at the next election, I’m not aware of many spending programs that get cut in reality once they are in place. The public choice problem suggests that at that point the people getting the money for whatever reason will have such a strong interest in continuing it, and that the general public will have a relatively weak interest in killing any particular program, that it will almost never happen except in times of extreme budget crisis when the interest of the general public in killing programs is very high.