Skip to content
Michael (Botany of Desire) Pollan has a breathtaking piece in the current New Yorker on the current wave of scientific research on the benefits – and not merely the medical benefits – of mindful and well-directed use of psilocybin and other chemicals classified as “hallucinogens” or “psychedelics” or (in some uses) “entheogens.” It’s as good an introduction to the field as one could ask for. Well-written, of course: what else, from Pollan? More than that, it catches all the right nuances of a technically, socially, and even metaphysically hairy field of inquiry.
The central idea is that the mystiform experiences that psilocybin and other drugs can trigger under the right circumstances can be beneficial, not only in treating specific problems – end-of-life anxiety, for example, or nicotine dependence – but by enriching lives: making some people “better than well.” So far the studies are small, but the results are impressive.
It’s encouraging to see the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health taking a scientific attitude: cautious but interested. It’s discouraging, though – alas! – not at all surprising to see the Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse responding to exciting research results by worrying about what might happen if someone tells the children.
Among the central characters in Pollan’s narrative is Robert Jesse, among the most impressive – I might even say “saintly” – people have I ever encountered. Bob doesn’t push for credit; it’s nice when someone like that gets credit just the same.
My colleagues at Johns Hopkins have a newÂ paperÂ out, reporting that psilocybin, the “magic mushroom” chemical, can bring about significant and lasting changes in the key personality domain called “Openness.”
My colleagues at Johns Hopkins have a newÂ paperÂ out, reporting thatÂ psilocybin, the “magic mushroom” chemical, can bring about significant and lasting changes in a key aspect of personality. This is big newsÂ for academic psychology:
A large body of evidence, including longitudinal analyses of personality change, suggests that core personality traits are predominantly stable after age 30. To our knowledge, no study has demonstrated changes in personality in healthy adults after an experimentally manipulated discrete event. Intriguingly, double-blind controlled studies have shown that the classic hallucinogen psilocybin occasions personally and spiritually significant mystical experiences that predict long-term changes in behaviors, attitudes and values. In the present report we assessed the effect of psilocybin on changes in the five broad domains of personality â€“ Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Consistent with participant claims of hallucinogen-occasioned increases in aesthetic appreciation, imagination, and creativity, we found significant increases in Openness following a high-dose psilocybin session. In participants who had mystical experiences during their psilocybin session, Openness remained significantly higher than baseline more than 1 year after the session. Â [from the report’sÂ abstract
The five domains named above constitute the widely embracedÂ Five Factor ModelÂ of personality. Â Openness, the factor showing increases in the Hopkins studies, isÂ describedÂ as curiosity, creativity,Â openness to unusual ideas,Â openness toÂ emotion, openness toÂ adventure, appreciation for art, and variety of experience. Â Its poles are described asÂ “inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious.”
Surely there can be too much of a good thing: so “open” as to be awash in fantasy, for example, or continually overwhelmed by emotion. Â But for more than a few of us, doesn’t aÂ judicious increase in Openness sound appealing?
Continue reading “Psilocybin and personality change”
That some hallucinogen experiences are trivial does not mean that none is profound.
Earlier, I posted some of the key findings of the Johns Hopkins psilocybin experiments and a condensation of the concerns and criticisms the research has drawn. I promised responses to some of those concerns; this is the first in that series.
Concern/criticism:Â “What’s the big deal?Â I took mushrooms, and my experience was neither ‘spiritual’ nor life-changing.”
This of course proves that not all hallucinogen experiences are profound, but not that none is.*
Why are some hallucinogen experiences recalled as life-transforming and others as trivial?Â Likely because the trivial experiences involved a suboptimal dosage, ill-focused intentions, a suboptimal setting, or the wrong person. Or because even when all those things are right, any given experience may not be profound. But the research shows that well-screened and well-prepared people given a sufficient dose under good circumstances have a two-thirds or better chance of a profound experience, and a very small risk of real harm.
Continue reading “Mushroom Myth-conceptions, Part 2”
Last month’s report on a Johns Hopkins study of psilocybin and spirituality, of which I’m a co-author, has drawn numerous comments on blogs and on-line news articles.Â A fraction of those comments have raised questions or criticisms which I’d like to try to address.Â (On the RBC, see Mark’s posts and Andy’s critique.)
For those who think that substances such as psilocybin have something valuable to offer spiritual seekers, myself included, it may be helpful to reflect upon the concerns of people less invested in the subject (“disinterested,” even).Â At the same time, the exercise could help clear up misunderstandings of the research or its implications.
Here’s a condensation of the issues I’ve heard raised.Â I will be taking them up one at a time in forthcoming posts.Â If you’re aware of other issues, feel free to add them as comments to this post.
1.Â “I took mushrooms, and my experience was neither ‘spiritual’ nor life-changing.Â So what’s the big deal?” (response)
2.Â The studies used volunteers with a spiritual orientation, so of course they reported spiritual experiences, and so the studies prove nothing.
3.Â Hallucinogens cause hallucinations; hallucinations cannot be a source of learning, healing, or betterment.
4.Â Psilocybin may cause people to adopt untrue beliefs (e.g., about the nature of ultimate reality).
5.Â The substance may harm some people or cause them to harm themselves or others.
6.Â An enlightening experience doesn’t necessarily lead to an enlightened life.
For a refresher on the research findings, continue reading beneath the fold.
(And many thanks to Mark and to Keith for welcoming me to the RBC.)
Continue reading “Mushroom Myth-conceptions”
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.