Sue Lowden’s fuster-cluck

A Republican consultant in Nevada thinks that Sue Lowden is in a hole on “chickens for checkups” and needs to stop digging.

Author: Mark Kleiman

Professor of Public Policy at the NYU Marron Institute for Urban Management and editor of the Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. Teaches about the methods of policy analysis about drug abuse control and crime control policy, working out the implications of two principles: that swift and certain sanctions don't have to be severe to be effective, and that well-designed threats usually don't have to be carried out. Books: Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (with Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken) When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment (Princeton, 2009; named one of the "books of the year" by The Economist Against Excess: Drug Policy for Results (Basic, 1993) Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control (Greenwood, 1989) UCLA Homepage Curriculum Vitae Contact:

7 thoughts on “Sue Lowden’s fuster-cluck”

  1. And besides being a clever pun, you can use fuster-cluck as campaign literature and on the news. A win-win-win for the environment.

  2. Provided, Dan, that you are not prone to Spoonerisms. There was a program called the Tuck-Fortney report many years ago that required similar care in enunciation.

  3. I thought of that Ed, but the risk of such a miscue might cause viewers to come back and watch the news…slimmer chances have been acted upon.

  4. All I know is this: If Harry Reid cannot defeat this Yahoo he will deserve his K Street sinecure.

  5. But, KLG, as the Obama impersonator said on Saturday Night Live about the losing candidate in the Mass. Senate race, she couldn't beat Dick Cheney for mayor of Berkeley. If that is true of Reid also, then we may have a brand new Yahoo in the Senate real soon.

Comments are closed.