Gee, I wonder why it might have occurred to anyone to say that the right wing habitually deploys the rhetoric of violence?
Update For those who are hard of reading, here’s the relevant passage. It follows a not-very-well-written rehearsal of the usual wingnut analogy between Roe v. Wade and Dredd Scott
[O]nce before, our nation was forced to repudiate the Supreme Court with mass bloodshed. We remain steadfast in our belief that this will not be necessary again, but only if those committed to justice do not waiver or compromise, and send a clear and unmistakable signal to their elected officials.
Of course, this is silly history as well as appalling rhetoric. The Civil War started not because the abolitionists lost a Supreme Court decision, but because the slavemasters lost an election. But the basic threat is clear: if the lunatic right-to-lifers can’t end abortion by lawful means plus the occasional assassination, they’ll resort to mass violence. Find me a comparable threat from a source with equivalent standing in Democratic politics to the standing RedState has with the GOP, and then let’s talk about the equivalence of the two sides.