Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
Christine O’Donnell Christine O’Donnell says “nutty” things, has “serious character problems,” lacks “rectitude and truthfulness and sincerity,” and belongs in the United States Senate.
Christine O’Donnell says “nutty” things, has “serious character problems,” lacks “rectitude and truthfulness and sincerity,” and belongs in the United States Senate.
As long as that’s clear.
Comments are closed.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
Given that senators generally vote along party lines, doesn't Rove's approach make sense, as would that of Democrats who supported a whack job who was running for the Senate as a Democrat? Of course, it is much less likely that a whack job would be a Democrat, but that's another matter.
Having O'Donnell out as the craziest makes the Angle / Rand / etc folks seem normal by comparison.
Apparently Mark was thinking someone with those qualifications belonged in the administration or on the faculty of UCLA.
I think we got as much honesty out of Rove as one could possibly expect.
Question for you: Does Dennis Kucinich belong in Congress? To put it as starkly as possible: If the choice for President were George W. Bush or Dennis Kucinich, whom would you vote for?
Dennis Kucinich is objectively disconnected from reality (see his stories about alien abduction), and he has used some weird rhetoric (Department Of Peace), but then again George W Bush fails on the same grounds, if in different ways. It's hardly the same as a match-up between a centrist corporate Democrat and a nutjob tea partier. Now, if Kucinich were to run against Voinovich, that might be a fairer comparison.
That said, I have some sympathy with your position, which is close to Rove's: if you're a partisan, it takes a pretty awesome level of craziness to get you not to vote for your party's nominee, no matter how much you may despise them and regret their nomination – although how much you dislike the opposing nominee also counts. but, even if perhaps they have to back the nominees they've got, that doesn't mean they can't also stand up for the idea of electing sane, informed people who have actual ideas of what policies (not slogans) they want to see happen.
If I wanted a Majority Leader McConnell, I might well vote for this fruitcake in Delaware, hoping that the damage she'd inflict would be limited to a string of embarrassments. But I'd also try to prevent future instances of the inmates running the asylum – and there's the difference. Instead of publicly bemoaning the fact that all of the energy in their party is coming from a herd of raging loonies disconnected from the real world, the Republicans have learned that they'd best Clap Louder, or get driven out of their cushy sinecures and out of the party.
Henry's right. It's basically the same argument as the pro-Lieberman crowd made.
Warren, I'm afraid I wasn't clear. My point was that Mark is being unrealistic. The Democratic leadership in the House no doubt thinks Kucinich is a ding-dong and wishes he'd go away. They don't waste a lot of breath on the subject however.
Well Larry, we never got the choice between Kucinich and GWBush because the Democrats didn't select one of their dingbats in their primary.
The Republicans on the other hand actually did select GWBush twice. (and the American population also voted for GW, more or less.)
I'll keep with the 'chaff' theory though from the party echelons – let the hostile fire go towards the weakest candidate.