Wayne Hall threatens to write a paper entitled “Problematizing the Foucauldian Hegemony.”
Author: Mark Kleiman
Professor of Public Policy at the NYU Marron Institute for Urban Management and editor of the Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. Teaches about the methods of policy analysis about drug abuse control and crime control policy, working out the implications of two principles: that swift and certain sanctions don't have to be severe to be effective, and that well-designed threats usually don't have to be carried out. Books: Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (with Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken) When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment (Princeton, 2009; named one of the "books of the year" by The Economist Against Excess: Drug Policy for Results (Basic, 1993) Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control (Greenwood, 1989) UCLA Homepage Curriculum Vitae Contact: Markarkleiman-at-gmail.com View all posts by Mark Kleiman
13 thoughts on “Papers-we’d-like-to-read Dep’t”
Needs a subtitle: A Post-Constructivist Analysis of Instantiated Ontogeny, starring Henry Fonda as The President.
…and Leslie Nielsen as The Captain.
“With Doris Day in part of hypotenuse.”
(Sorry: Tom Lehrer moment.)
Isn’t Ingrid Bergman the hypotenuse of The Eternal Triangle?
Doris Day in the recording I’ve got. Lehrer played with his lyrics sometimes. In “Pollution” I’ve got “The breakfast garbage that you throw into the Bay / They drink for lunch in San JosÃ©” because it was recorded in San Francisco–but I’m told that the New York version has “Troy” and “Perth Amboy.”
All good, but you are missing ‘cathected’…
Why would one need to problematize Foucauldian Hegemony? It’s already a problem. St Ronnie once said as much: “Government is not the solution, it’s the problem. That, and Foucauldian Hegemony.”
P.S. In case you’re wondering why nobody knows about the second part of that quote, it’s a massive cover-up by the Obama administration (second only to Benghazi, of course). I’m surprised the Repubs didn’t bring that up while filibustering the Secretary of Hegemony, I mean, Defense.
Please somehow add “transgressive” and “interrogate” and it will be the perfect title.
Can’t someone work in my currently most-hated non-word, “incentivize?”
The title of my new book: Incentivizing Solutions to Global Warming
Subtitled: How Capitalism 3.0 can save the World
Careful, Tom Friedman might sue.
Buzzphrase generators have been around for a while now. The typical application is managementspeak, but you could as easily make one for any other intellectual subculture you dislike: critical studies, feminism, etc.
oh gawd, please no. I LIVED THROUGH THAT.
the internet can make one for you anyway: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/
Comments are closed.