No, George W. Bush did not “serve honorably.”
    No, he did not earn his honorable discharge.

The official record shows it.

And no, this doesn’t depend on any disputed documents.

U.S. News and World Report has the details on Bush’s deficiencies: not that much different from those the Boston Globe had, but then U.S. News isn’t by anyone’s definition part of the “liberal media.”

Author: Mark Kleiman

Professor of Public Policy at the NYU Marron Institute for Urban Management and editor of the Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. Teaches about the methods of policy analysis about drug abuse control and crime control policy, working out the implications of two principles: that swift and certain sanctions don't have to be severe to be effective, and that well-designed threats usually don't have to be carried out. Books: Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (with Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken) When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment (Princeton, 2009; named one of the "books of the year" by The Economist Against Excess: Drug Policy for Results (Basic, 1993) Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control (Greenwood, 1989) UCLA Homepage Curriculum Vitae Contact: Markarkleiman-at-gmail.com

One thought on “No, George W. Bush did not “serve honorably.”
    No, he did not earn his honorable discharge.”

  1. No, George W. Bush did not "serve honorably." No, he did not earn his honorable discharge. And no, this doesn't depend on any disputed documents.

    Mark A. R. Kleiman

Comments are closed.