Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
Why HOPE isn’t just a deterrence program.
Glenn Loury and I discuss crime and punishment. I’m trying to understand the dramatic success of swift-and-certain sanctions regimes such as HOPE, and coming to think that “deterrence” isn’t really the right category.
Comments are closed.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
This seems of a piece with what The Last Psychiatrist seems to believe. Good parenting is, in part, about being consistent in your discipline. It’s not the type of discipline necessarily, but how it is meted out. Is it meted out for clearly laid out reasons? And in consistent fashion? Or is it meted out randomly and without any regard for the offense? The goal is to help the child develop a super-ego that will govern behaviour. So the goal of the state here, is yes, to be a good parent, to help the person develop a super ego and teach them to govern their own behavior. If you let someone get away with constant parole violations, and then send them away for another year or two based on something small like a shoplifting charge, or failing a drug test, that doesn’t train the person to behave differently; it teaches them is that the state is irrational, unpredictable, unreliable, and capricious in its assertion of power. And that would be a fair lesson to learn in that case. To the extent we’re going to use the state apparatus to govern behaviour, it would, I hope, be done in a fashion that ultimately encourages people to govern their own selves.
Great conversation. I think the Focault/Sade observation is brilliant, as was the observation that criminals were all victims first. In my classroom, I routinely have to mete out “punishments” to kids who were never given “the gift of self-control”, and so it feels terribly unfair to cause them even more anguish. But in the end, it is for their own good, as well as the rest of us. The larger problem is whether there is actually a support system that is there for them, that believes in them, on the other side. But as you point out, this is only part of a larger response that needs to happen, so that the self-efficacy is built from the beginning.
“halfway decent parent” – Exactly right. When I was working in substance abuse with adjudicated teens (and adults), it became clear as day to an object relations oriented therapist that what we were doing – myself, the courts, probation departments – was re-parenting. The best results I got was not through the mandated CBT programs, but through the parenting groups (where I ditched the standard drug abuse horses**t and worked on parenting skills and building the relationship) and intensive individual therapy, where again I eschewed the ‘drug treatment’ playbook and worked on building life skills and ego strength. Drug abuse is a symptom, not a cause (in terms of core functioning); that this essential truth has been inverted in treatment and cultural perspective is itself a crime.
In my opinion this is the frame (re-parenting), the lens that must be adopted if there is to be any hope of showing lasting results in changing destructive behavior. This includes adults. I don’t know how ready our society is to drop millennia of cultural programming and recognize the long reach of childhood into adult behavior, but for adolescents it’s a no brainer. Reading the research on HOPE was incredibly satisfying, in that it validated my perceptions of how badly we misappropriate the resources of society’s behavior response system (i.e., legal system). Hillary Clinton was right about community, and the necessity of community engagement. Maybe HOPE and 24/7 will catalyze this necessary shift. I did my best to change my little corner.
“To no man will we .. delay justice” – Magna Carta. Mediaeval criminal justice tended to be expeditious anyway, but I’m wondering if positing speed as a value of justice is original to Anglo-Norman law. Is it in the Pandects of Justinian say?
I left my Justinian in my other jacket, but the Sixth Amendment orders that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.”
Ecclesiastes 8:11- “because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the children of man is fully set to do evil.” Or a more modern paraphrase of the same scripture from the GLT translation says “when a sentence against a crime isn’t carried out quickly, people are encouraged to commit crimes.”
Here are people working a similar vein but from the other end, Mark. Check out David Kirp’s NYT op-ed piece from yesterday, “The Secret to Fixing Bad Schools.”