Vulture conservation in India and the USA
The painkiller diclofenac – which you have rubbed onto sore muscles as Voltaren – is fed to arthritic cows in India as an act of charity; but when vultures scavenge the carcasses, the drug is lethal to them. Vulture populations have crashed, in one study to 3% of previous levels. Packs of feral dogs, many rabid, have flourished. The anxious Parsees of Mumbai, deprived of their traditional funeral partners, have been forced to incinerate their loved ones in solar ovens. (Have they discovered a green outsourcing opportunity?)
The Indian government has halted veterinary production of the drug. Good for them, but late in the day. The US government, as you would expect, has been far more proactive in vulture conservation.
Author: Michael O'Hare
Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, Michael O'Hare was raised in New York City and trained at Harvard as an architect and structural engineer. Diverted from an honest career designing buildings by the offer of a job in which he could think about anything he wanted to and spend his time with very smart and curious young people, he fell among economists and such like, and continues to benefit from their generosity with on-the-job social science training.
He has followed the process and principles of design into "nonphysical environments" such as production processes in organizations, regulation, and information management and published a variety of research in environmental policy, government policy towards the arts, and management, with special interests in energy, facility siting, information and perceptions in public choice and work environments, and policy design. His current research is focused on transportation biofuels and their effects on global land use, food security, and international trade; regulatory policy in the face of scientific uncertainty; and, after a three-decade hiatus, on NIMBY conflicts afflicting high speed rail right-of-way and nuclear waste disposal sites. He is also a regular writer on pedagogy, especially teaching in professional education, and co-edited the "Curriculum and Case Notes" section of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
Between faculty appointments at the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning and the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, he was director of policy analysis at the Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. He has had visiting appointments at UniversitÃ Bocconi in Milan and the National University of Singapore and teaches regularly in the Goldman School's executive (mid-career) programs.
At GSPP, O'Hare has taught a studio course in Program and Policy Design, Arts and Cultural Policy, Public Management, the pedagogy course for graduate student instructors, Quantitative Methods, Environmental Policy, and the introduction to public policy for its undergraduate minor, which he supervises. Generally, he considers himself the school's resident expert in any subject in which there is no such thing as real expertise (a recent project concerned the governance and design of California county fairs), but is secure in the distinction of being the only faculty member with a metal lathe in his basement and a 4Ã—5 Ebony view camera. At the moment, he would rather be making something with his hands than writing this blurb.
View all posts by Michael O'Hare
4 thoughts on “Friday vulture blogging”
How would you feel if they told you that there's no room in the cemetery, and the crematorium has broken down with no date for reopening?
Grieving? Upset? Angry? Outraged? Offended?
I'd have gone with no adjective at all.
Me, I think anxious is just right.
But then, I don't get the sense of entitlement that lets people become offended when cultural traditions are forced to change.
Comments are closed.