I have posted the opinions, both the opinions of the Court and the dissent, in Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC. The opinion holds that the plaintiffs’ claims under state law were not barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). Both opinions are placed together as a single file.
One thought on “Connecticut S. Court’s Gun Lawsuit Opinions”
Comments are closed.
Much as the advertising was offensive to any civilized person, it still seems like protected speech to me, except for the fact that advertising in general does not seem to be covered by the constitutional protection of other speech for some reason.