Before 2014, if you were born with congenital heart disease, like my son was, there was a good chance youâ€™d never be able to get health insurance because you had a preexisting condition…
If your parents didnâ€™t have medical insurance, you might not live long enough to even get denied because of a preexisting condition. Babies shouldnâ€™t die when surgery can save them.. It shouldnâ€™t matter how much money you make.
His comments on health reform and preexisting conditions are here. His newborn son’s heartwarming story is below. My favorite line is simple: “We need to take care of each other.”
Speaker Ryan’s bill would allow states to waive ACA protections that now bar insurers from charging higher premiums to childhood cancer survivors. It would also allow states to weaken the Essential Health Benefit, which is so critical to ensure that insurance actually works for people who experience costly or life-altering conditions.
I haven’t even gotten to Medicaid and the impact of higher premiums for low-income people.
Advocacy is not limited to adults. These Wisconsin teens shared some powerful stories with me about their fight against childhood cancer. pic.twitter.com/VJ0eQDXu7U
The long-run trajectory should really concern Republicans. The American Health Care Act, the putative replacement for the ACA, produced a surprisingly emphatic victory for Democrats. It bolstered the national consensus that every American is entitled to affordable and decent health coverage.
Me, at Politico, on the shambolic fate of the American Health Care Act.
There was a conspicuous smallness to this AHCA effort, a puzzling shoddiness given the human and political stakes. Many in the GOP, above all President Trump, seemed strangely uninterested in the policy details. To the extent Republicans did have an animating passion, it was to puncture President Obamaâ€™s legacyâ€”and to avoid looking foolish by failing to honor their â€œrepeal and replaceâ€ rhetoric.
Only they had no viable replacement. For all their endless warnings about how Obamaâ€™s signature health law was hurting American families, driving up costs and putting us on the path toward socialism, it turns out they didnâ€™t care enough to put in the work.
Reporters Mary Jordan and Kevin Sullivan profile a 59-year-old Texas woman named Tamara Estes. She was born into some affluence, raised in â€œa grand home with a built-in pool.â€ But her mom died when she was four. Her dad died when she was nineteen. She married young, and by age 26 she was divorced with two kids. She has since traveled a sad path of downward economic mobility, never going to college, taking a succession of dead-end jobs. She now works as a school bus driver in Valley View, Texas, with an annual income of $24,000. â€œWith four days left to payday, she has $118.72 in her checking account.â€
She is a die-hard Trump supporter. SheÂ seethes at undocumented immigrants and their children in her own community. It’s pitiful to hear her. President Trump brings out the worst in his own neediest supporters before he betrays them.
Ms. Estes is also uninsured. Yet she supports a president and a party thatÂ specifically propose to putÂ coverage out of reach for low-income near-retirees like herself. She so perfectly fits a certain political-demographic story that her biographic details might have been perfected at the MIT Media Lab or Huffington Post. As with most things, though, it’s a bit more complicated. I looked up what’s available toÂ her under ACA, and it’s hardly surprising that she doesn’t feel particularly grateful for it.
Tamara Estes is not the worldâ€™s most appealing or most perfect person. She should take fewer puffs on bigoted and deceptive right-wing radio. She shouldnâ€™t blame immigrants for her lifeâ€™s disappointments and problems. Harming immigrants will do nothing to help her. As a friend noted on email, it wouldnâ€™t hurt her to learn a little Spanish, too. If nothing else, she might learn a few kinds words for the kids she transports. She might be less lonely and isolated if she got to know her immigrant neighbors, who seem like lovely people.
But I canâ€™t hate her. In violence prevention, we like to say: â€œHurt people hurt people.â€ Thatâ€™s true in politics, too. Tamara Estes is hurting, and sheâ€™s lashing out at her own neighbors. Thatâ€™s ugly to see.
But she still needs help. She didnâ€™t get enough from the ACA. Sheâ€™ll get a lot less from President Trump, but we supporters of expanded coverage have given her too little reason to really know that. Whatever happens in the current knife-fight over health reform. We face a daunting moral and political challenge to fix that, to go in precisely the opposite direction Republicans are determined to go.
Even if the American Health Care Act never passes, today’s House Republicans willÂ bear the stigma of having proposedÂ it.
Especially in our polarized time, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is an essential nonpartisan authority, ready to advise Congress and the American public of the likely economic impact of major legislation. CBO’s current director was selected by Speaker Ryan, now-HHS Secretary Price, and other Republicans in consultation with Democrats. CBOÂ isn’t perfect, of course. But it continues a proud nonpartisan tradition that couldn’t be more important.
That’s not the worst of it. Table 4 below is drawn from the CBO report. Health insurance premiums for low-income older workers would skyrocket under AHCA. By how much? Â The numbers are almost unbelievable.
On the nongroup market, annual net insurance premiums for a 64-year-old with an income of $26,500 would rise from $1,700 to $14,600. Yup, that an annual increase of $12,900, to buy a significantly less generous policy than is nowÂ available under ACA.Â For proponents of AHCA, that’s politically self-immolating.
In all my years of studying health policy, I have never seen a less professional, more shambolic performance than I have seen among Republicans seeking to pass AHCA. Even if this bill never passes, House Republicans will remain the people who proposed it. I just don’t understand their gameplan.
Death panel rhetoric is not quite working the way it did in 2010. I’m not sure what is more depressing: that a public official would make such a ridiculous statement, or that he might actually believe what he was saying.
A GOP official tries the “death panel” line in 2017 and opens the gates of hell. People are done with the bullshit. pic.twitter.com/0vS2rizka7
PS: Now that President Obama has left office, I feel safe revealing that a vast conspiracy involving several teaching hospitals snuck my 87-year-old dad past the Medicare death panel for advanced cancer care in the era of Obamacare. Ironically, the conspiracy unfolded in the belly of the beast–liberal Massachusetts–where many people are saying that white heterosexual men older than 74 are no longer eligible for hospital care. Somehow, we pulled one over on the man. My dad is apparently cancer-free as of this week and doing well.
PPS: Bill Akins, the man in the video, is secretary of the Republican executive committee in Florida’s Pasco County. The Washington Post‘s David Weigel examined Akins’ Facebook page. It, um, wasn’t pretty. Just one example below. The GOP needs to do serious housecleaning. Its problems on matters of race didn’t start and won’t end with President Trump. Continue reading “Still at it with the death panel thing”
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.