White House: No Comment On Rove
WASHINGTON, July 11, 2005
For two years, the White House has insisted that presidential adviser Karl Rove had nothing to do with the leak of a CIA officer’s identity. And President Bush said the leaker would be fired.
But Mr. Bush’s spokesman wouldn’t repeat any of those assertions Monday in the face of Rove’s own lawyer saying his client spoke with at least one reporter about Valerie Plame’s role at the CIA before she was identified in a newspaper column after her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, wrote an article criticizing the Bush administration’s Iraq policies.
Rove described the woman to a reporter as someone who “apparently works” at the CIA, according to an e-mail obtained by Newsweek magazine.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan refused to discuss the matter at two news briefings Monday. He said he would not comment because the leak is the focus of a federal criminal investigation.
“The prosecutors overseeing the investigation had expressed a preference to us that one way to help the investigation is not to be commenting on it from this podium,” McClellan said in response to a barrage of questions about Rove and the previous White House denials.
“I’m well aware, like you, of what was previously said,” McClellan said. “And I will be glad to talk about it at the appropriate time.” He said the appropriate time would be when the investigation is completed.
CBS News Correspondent John Roberts reports the change of heart was odd, considering the investigation was well underway when the White House came out to defend Rove and nine months later when Mr. Bush promised harsh punishment for anyone who leaked Plame’s identity
On June 10, 2004, Mr. Bush said he stood by his pledge to fire anyone found to have done so.
Democrats Monday said they hoped the president would make good on that pledge. But Rove’s attorney tells Roberts there’s nothing in the e-mail that Rove hasn’t already told investigators and that Rove was only trying to steer Cooper away from potentially bad information, not disclose the identity of a covert agent.
He also said Rove has been assured by prosecutors that he is not a target of the investigation.
But, as Roberts reports, it was a bad day at the White House, unable to defend its own “on the record” statements and unable to explain why what it repeatedly said with such certainty 21 months ago now would appear so demonstrably false.
Note that the first six paragraphs are from the Associated Press.
I just talked to a right-wing friend who assured me that the Plame affair was a non-story. Having successfully kept this story on the back burner for two years, the Bushies and their friends are still hoping it will blow over without ever dominating the headlines, especially if the media attention could be diverted to the “poor Judy Miller” soap opera and the accompanying panic about press freedom.
But the tone of the story above suggests that the Big Media (including even the AP, which has frequently sounded fairly Fox-ish over the past couple of years) has finally gotten tired of being dicked around with.
Perhaps one of these days we’ll even see some coverage of the Plame affair — as opposed to the (son-of-)Punch-and-Judy sideshow — in the New York Times.
Mirabile dictu, today turns out to be one of those days, with a hard-hitting piece by David Stout that starts with “The White House went on the defensive today … “