The power in your right hand.

I am not a sentimental person. But this poem about voting gets me a little choked up every time.

“The Poor Voter on Election Day”
By John Greenleaf Whittier


 

The proudest now is but my peer,
The highest not more high;
Today, of all the weary year,
A king of men am I.
 

Today, alike the great and small,
The nameless and the known;
My palace is the people’s hall,
The ballot-box my throne!
 

Who serves today upon the list
Beside the served shall stand;
Alike the brown and wrinkled fist,
The gloved and dainty hand!
 

The rich is level with the poor,
The weak is strong today;
And sleekest broadcloth counts no more
Than homespun frock of gray.
 

Today let pomp and vain pretense
My stubborn right abide;
I set a plain man’s common sense
Against the pedant’s pride.
 

Today shall simple manhood try
The strength of gold and land;
The wide world has not wealth to buy
The power in my right hand!
 

While there’s grief to set redress,
Or balance to adjust,
Where weighs our living manhood less
Than Mammon’s vilest dust—
 

While there’s a right to need my vote,
A wrong to sweep away,
Up! clouted knee and ragged coat!
A man’s a man today!
 

I’m not a sentimentalist. In fact, I’m a skeptic. But I try to read this poem to my classes every election year—it sounds much better when spoken, slowly—and my voice breaks a little every time I do.

Please vote.

Author: Andrew Sabl

I'm a political theorist and Visiting Professor (through 2017) in the Program on Ethics, Politics and Economics at Yale. My interests include the history of political thought, toleration, democratic theory, political ethics, problems of coordination and convention, the realist movement in political theory, and the thought of David Hume. My first book, Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics (Princeton, 2002) covered many of these topics, with a special focus on the varieties of democratic politics and the disparate qualities of mind and character appropriate to those who practice each of them. My second book Hume's Politics: Coordination and Crisis in the History of England was published in 2012; I am currently finishing a book on toleration, with the working title The Virtues of Hypocrisy, under contract with Harvard University Press. A Los Angeles native, I got my B.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard. Before coming to Yale I taught at Vanderbilt and at UCLA, where I was an Assistant, Associate, and Full Professor; and held visiting positions at Williams, Harvard, and Princeton. I am married to Miriam Laugesen, who teaches health policy and the politics of health care at the Mailman School of public health at Columbia, and we have a twelve-year-old son.

8 thoughts on “The power in your right hand.”

  1. I am proud to have voted against Ken Buck. As a bonus, I also got to vote against Tom Tancredo, a pleasure I thought I would never get since I didn't live in his House district when he was in Congress.

  2. For the alternative view (a hyper-sophisticated defence of the legitimacy of the option of not voting as a protest), see Daniel Davies today at Crooked Timber – a blog that gets footnotes in comments. There are 243 comments already so I'm not going to waste time adding one there (the Paradox of Commenting).

    My useless pennyworth as a non-voter. DD is assuming in a fuddy-duddy way that what matters is your vote. No, what matters most consequentially is how your vote is perceived. So the correct voting strategy for a Wobbly is, consequentially speaking:

    – to go to the Wobbly demo with a "Hang the bankstas!" sign

    – tell pollsters and blogs, before and after voting, that you are casting a write-in vote for Che Guevara

    (I believe there is Druze and Jesuit moral theology on the legitimacy of concealment of your true position)

    – in the privacy of the voting booth, vote for the weak-kneed apology for a Democrat on the ballot, on the off chance that your vote makes a difference and you would feel very stupid if Sharron Angle say won by 1 vote.

    of course, the Golden Rule would just say, non-consequentially, that you should vote if at least one candidate is an acceptable representative, and you should choose the least bad acceptable candidate.

  3. If you really want a 'none of the above' vote, spoil your ballot – and press for a system that counts and reports spoiled ballots! But I am more for James's Golden Rule than that – it's irresponsible in almost every election to choose none of the above.

Comments are closed.