TIC: Have you heard about this caffeine underwear?
TAC: No I havenâ€™t. By all means, tell me about the caffeine underwear. For starters, huh?
TIC: The underwear is infused with caffeine. Itâ€™s shapewear and boxer briefsâ€”
TAC: â€”that you wear? Like, on your body?
TIC: Yes yes of course. Thatâ€™s the point.
TAC: How bizarre. So, the caffeine in the underwear is meant to leave the fabric and go into your body?
TIC: Well sure. But these two companies that sell them just got fined by the FTC.
TAC: Yea that sounds kind of shady. But, I dunno, I guess the nicotine patch is pretty standard. And donâ€™t they sell transdermal patches with birth control hormones in them? Say, my initial opinion on the topic of caffeine underwear is beginning to change!
TIC: Oh, no no no. Thatâ€™s notâ€”I see that Iâ€™ve confused you.
Any platform where a company can engage directly with potential customers is obviously a powerful tool to be harnessed; a healthy social media presence is important for the success of most businesses. When you work in regulated markets like pharmaceuticals or alcohol, engaging with a potential customer base can get a little tricky, especially where â€œtrickyâ€ means harmful and expensive. Let’s agree that this is also your working definition of “risk”.
It would be hard to argue that a companyâ€™s social media presence is anything besides a more dynamic outlet for advertising. For regulated markets, mitigating risk even when advertising in â€œtraditionalâ€ platforms like print and TV gets a bit lumpy (e.g. the pretty ad with a lady enjoying a tire swing has to be that much more appealing to allay the turn-off of a full page of micro print describing risks and side effects), but the rules and implications around use of social media is fuzzier, so those risks can grow.
Just in time, it seems, as last week the FDA proposed new guidelinesÂ for companies who post about their drugs or medical devices on social media platforms. The guidelines would require that any tweet or post or unit of social media speech (air quotes optional) promoting a drug or medical device to include the productâ€™s risks and adverse side effects. Itâ€™s hard for me to imagine a worthwhile tweet about a prescription drug anyway, but to jam anything but the risks of a drug into a tweet seems impossible.
Always helpful, the FDA has offered a sample tweet for a fictional drug that sounds kind of attractive to me.
NoFocus (rememberine HCl) for mild to moderate memory loss-May cause seizures in patients with a seizure disorderÂ www.nofocus.com/risk
Sign me up, I guess. Quick aside, though: how odd for a drug to be named after not the affliction (still weird), but the cause of the affliction the drug is meant to address. When I have a headache I reach for my bottle of JawClenchesWhenSleepDeprived.
These new guidelines are going to make it very difficult for companies to tweet about their products. Â The FDA’s NoFocus conveniently has only one risk to list, but even relatively safe drugs often have a number of possible side effects and risks. While Iâ€™m not sad about maybe never seeing a tweet about Viagra, these guidelines donâ€™t seem to demonstrate a working knowledge of the platform.
Possibly more quietly impactful, the guidelines also prohibit a company from curating discussions on itâ€™s own website by adding positive reviews and taking down negative ones.
Non-medical use of prescription drugs is undeniably the fastest growing drug problem in the U.S. (the only substance with a higher rate of new users is cannabis) and since over half of users are getting the drugs from friends or family, it makes sense that the DEA has focused on diverting that supply at the medicine cabinet before it changes hands.
It seems like the DEA would like us to think that the risk of holding on to old medication is that someone could take them without our consent. A 2012 Carnevale Associates policy brief on the efficacy of drug takebacks reports that users get drugs from friends or family without permission (steal them) only about 5% of the timeâ€”keeping our meds away from sneaky cohabitants is hardly the problem. If the DEAâ€™s drug take back program is effective in curbing non-medical prescription drug use, it wonâ€™t be because fewer opioids will be available for theft, it will be effective because we will have fewer opioids on hand give to our friends. We are who cannot be trusted with our own drugs.
The DEA has apparently been staking out Midwest Hydroganics of Illinois for a few years;Â 46-year-old Angela KirkingÂ is only the most recent individual to be hassledÂ after shopping there. Whether or not the search warrant holds, discovering some weed in a ladyâ€™s “art room” seems like a waste of clean uniforms.
In the gritty TV show where I imagine all drug raids take place, pulling up a few grams of weed is hardly a DUN DUN DUN moment. I can’t think of a more benign place for marijuana to be found than in the art room of some funky lady who paints faces for a living and eats the petals off her organic hibiscus plant.
Now that she knows the DEA is watching the spot she bought some compost at that one time, she does not plan to take her business elsewhere.
“I’d love to send all my friends [to Midwest Hydroganics] to see how far they take this.â€
Her new goal in the drug war is to run the DEA around until they tucker themselves out. This weekÂ IÂ am helpingÂ my landlord put in a bunch of raised beds and beside the buttloads of weed the City of Oakland requires we grow, I will be sticking in a hibiscus.
Stories like these don’t help the DEA with their reputation for being a little silly and maybe a lot deaf. Â In a pressÂ conference last week DEA Chief Michele Leonhart provided a pull-quote for all saying the trend of relaxing opinions on cannabis in the U.S. only makes her â€œfight harder.â€
Itâ€™s unnerving for a government agent to declare that citizens donâ€™t know whatâ€™s good for them and the more those citizens change their minds, the harder that agency will resist changing gears. Because youâ€™ll see, youâ€™ll all see!
America is uninterested in seeing the Angela Kirkings of the world arrested at gunpoint for a stash of what they probably adorably still call dope. But for each article written about an upper-middle-class white lady getting arrested for possession, law enforcement arrests lots of black and brown people for pretty much the same thing without the media saying â€œboo.â€ Articles like the one in the Shorewood Patch get picked up because they fit a certain storyline. More on that in a later post
Anyway, if all this seems anecdotal, here comes some fun new data from Pew Research showingÂ that most people in the U.S. think cannabis will eventually be legal everywhere. Regarding the â€œhardâ€ drugs, a growing majority of Americans believe time and resources are better spent on recovery than prosecution. Also cocaine use is down (yay) and heroine use is up (boo).
What responsibility does the cannabis industry have to keep their marketing away from children?
Partnership at Drugfree.com, formerly Partnership for a Drug-Free America, has decided against running ads critical of cannabis legalization in Colorado and Washington, but they will be staging an educational PR campaign focused on how legalization could affect minors.
Does free speech mean that cannabis sellers should be able to advertise wherever they want? Marketing restrictions are in place in both Washington and Colorado, but CEO of the Partnership Steve Pasierb has said he believes those restrictions willÂ ultimatelyÂ fall apart in court. It seems natural that cannabis marketing could go the way of liquor and cigarettes but it has been well argued that those restrictions donâ€™t go far enough. Will it take a lawsuit settlement to restrict cannabis marketing for good?
On Monday Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed a bill requiring any individual seekingÂ Temporary Assistance for Needy Family (TANF) cash assistanceÂ who are deemed â€œreasonably likely to have a substance use disorderâ€ to undergo drug testing before they can receive cash support.
Does this program provide effective incentives for addicts to get clean? Or is it essentially punitive?Â Does this mean families with an addict head of household will have to jump through more hoops to pay their and their childrenâ€™s expenses? How does this help?
Those who test positive for a controlled substance may still receiveÂ cash assistance if they enroll in and complete an offered drug treatment plan. Cash assistance will end if any follow-up drug test (during or after treatment) is positive, with substantial waiting periods to re-apply: 90 days for the first positive test, 12 months for the second. Individuals chosen for drug testing will be determined by their answers to a written questionnaire.
It looks like the screening process wonâ€™t effectÂ TANF food stamps or EBT, so reflects a logic that a drug addict cannot be trusted with cash money.
Bryant said the new program will â€œmake a positive difference for families impacted by substance abuse,â€ indicating that the screening process is an appropriate part of the TANF programâ€™s mission to provide a â€œsafety net for families in need.â€
Republicans jump on the legalizing kick because marijuana’s an industry now and We Love Industry. I don’t know how to make an emoticon of a smiley face with $$ for eyes but if I did this is where I would put it.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.