October 21, 2006
Can't-make-this-stuff-up Dep't
Headline in the Washington Post (no, not The Onion):
During National 'Character Counts' Week,
Bush Stumps for Philanderer
Footnote The headline-writer seems to have lost his moral compass, perhaps from reading too many Christian Right press releases. Does the Congressman's "philandering" (i.e., adultery) really indicate a character flaw more serious than the one that led him to beat his mistress and threaten to strangle her? The Bible, at least on the surface, agrees with the headline-writer; it condemns adultery vigorously, and domestic assault not at all. Does the newspaper mean to embrace that judgment? Or perhaps the headline-writer has simply read correctly what "character" means in current American political discourse: abstaining from illicit pleasure, rather than from wanton cruelty.
Hold it, Mark. Sherwood has admitted the affair, and is therefore a 'philanderer. The accusations of abuse are simply that, accusations. I certainly would not be surprised if they are true, but would you want other politicians who have been accused of serious offenses, or even of the non-crime of being gay (I am thinking of Ted Strickland and the NAMBLA-smear) to have headline writers quote the accusation as fact?
Also, it makes for a neater headline. "Philanderer" is just one word; "Congressman accused of trying to strangle his mistress" runs on too long. I still think the headline is utterly marvelous, and I'm rather surprised that the Post had the nerve to run it. (Incidentally, does the current mushiness of the Post have anything to do with the fact that it's now published by Kate Graham's husband Richard -- who is a Republican, albeit a moderate one?)
Posted by: Bruce Moomaw at October 22, 2006 12:50 AMSherwood is an interesting study in Republican overreaching and hypocrisy. The legislature redistricted in his area to take the city of Scranton with all its inconvenient Democrats and younger Caseys in it. According to my friends in Scranton, the affair has been known for years, but even the huge Republican majority in the district is having trouble with the idea of trying to strangle his 23 year old mistress. It didn't seem to phase the minister in chief though, and he came in stumping for him, as you note on character counts week. W appears to be having as little impact there as he is most everywhere else. Count this one as an unexpected pickup for the Dems.
Posted by: Tom Gowen at October 22, 2006 09:26 AMIf the "Abuser" part were proven or admitted, then they could use that in the headline. There are things we believe as fact about people which might not be true enough to avoid lawsuits.
Posted by: American Citizen at October 24, 2006 11:52 AMThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
