ACORN defends itselfThey say they don't pay by the card, do have strong QA, turn in all registration cards because it's required by law, and flag questionable cards when they're turned in. If anyone on the other side has facts to contradict these claims, I'd like to hear them.
No, no, no, no, NO!!McCain steals votes in the wrong state and at the wrong season. Maybe he isn't a real conservative after all.
One more reason to oppose Voter IDLong lines at the polls in Atlanta. The bottleneck is at the identification verification stations, not the voting booths.
GOP v. democracyFormer Republican FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith says that "voter ID" laws designed to suppress voting among Democratic-leaning demographic groups (poor people, old people, members of racial minorities, women) are really just fine, even though they don't actually prevent any actual voting fraud. (Because there's no significant amount of voting fraud committed by going to the polls and pretending you're someone...
A part of the U.S. Attorney scandal people can understandThey were trying to cheat black and Latino soldiers out of their right to vote.
Still more "voter fraud" fraudIn six years of vigorous effort, DoJ has discovered no systematic vote fraud. It has, however, managed to ruin the lives of people who made innocent mistakes.
Voter fraud fraudThe Election Assistance Commission pays experts (one Dem, one Rep) to figure out how much voter fraud and intimidation exists. The team says fraudulent voting isn't much of a problem, but intimidation is. The Commission rewrite the report to say something different, suppresses the original, and holds the contractors to their contractual gag order. Hearings, please.
The "voter fraud" fraudThe FBI couldn't find any forgeries, and the U.S. Attorney decided that he couldn't prosecute people for voting fraudulently when they'd gotten ballots in the mail, sent by the state. But the Republicans had lost a close election, so the U.S. Attorney got fired for not convening a grand jury to harrass innocent people. Next time you read about "vote fraud," think about this case.
Deja vu all over againIrony? You want irony? How about a clearly false result in the election for Katherine Harris's old seat? Of course the Democrats in the House shouldn't put up with it.
The phony fliers: can't Mfume sue?OK. The Justice Department won't investigate. But can't Kweisi Mfume sue? To review the bidding (which Josh Marshall has been all over): Bob Ehrlich and Michael Steele brought in busloads of homeless African-American people from Philadelphia to black precincts in Prince George's County, Maryland, to hand out fliers headed "Ehrlich-Steele Democrats" and showing the pictures of three important African-American Maryland...
Elections reformFor a Voting Rights Act of 2007, covering everybody's right to vote and have that vote counted.
Compassionate conservatismI guess that's what you call it when you recruit black folks from homeless shelters in Philadelphia for $100 each and send them to black precincts in Prince George's County, Maryland, to hand out phony "Democratic" fliers for Republican candidates and claiming falsely that they have the endorsement of local black leaders. Some of the workers claim they weren't even told they were going to be working for Republican candidates.
Harassment and intimidation threadKeeping track of the day's outrages. So far, we've got phone calls threatening Virginia Democrats with arrest if they try to vote and armed intimidation of Latino voters in Arizona. If you see something, please send it in.
Robo-harassment hits the big time ABC News's campaign blog notices the "false-flag" robocalling scandal. But you'd never know the issues were harassment and deception, as opposed to the technology of automated calling.
"Voter fraud" fraudElection time is coming, so the right blogosphere is, as usual, all a-twitter about "voter fraud," which in their parlance always means voting by those ineligible to vote, not depriving those who are eligible of the right to vote as in Florida in 2000 or Ohio this year, or misrecording or miscounting of votes in badly designed (or deliberately misdesigned)...
In case you were wonderingNo, there's no evidence that voting by ineligible voters is a significant problem. Therefore yes, the push for laws to make it harder to vote (say, by requiring picture IDs that many poor, elderly, and rural voters don't have) will merely tend to suppress the Democratic vote, which is precisely what they are designed to do.
A GOP vote-suppression effort failsBob Ehrlich can't even collect 17,000 valid signatures on his referendum petitions. Good!
Axis of bigotryThe nativists in the House Republican Caucus join with the neo-Confederates to block extension of the Voting Rights Act.
Law. v. polics, voting rights departmentOnce again, polical appointees overruled career staff to sustain an effort to entrench the far right in power.
There they go againJeb wants to make his appointee the ultimate arbiter of whose vote gets counted in Florida, and whose doesn't.
Bush New England chair quits in phone-jamming scandalMore evidence of the willingness of the leadership of God's Official Party to interfere with the elections process.
Concerning capital punishment and tortureThe Republican National Committee is paying to have voter registration forms collected at shopping centers and the forms of those who register as Democrats shredded, depriving the victims of their right to vote.