Conservatives discover happinessForget the dumb use Ross Douthat wants to make of the happiness-research literature. The fact that he acknowledges it reflects a substantial political breakthrough.
Short-Run and Long-Run Stimulus in a Single MeasureIn the short run, we want households to consume more. In the long run, we want them to save more. Passing a progressive consumption tax now to take effect later provides incentives for both.
Would a Carbon Tax Make Higher Gasoline Taxes Unnecessary?Its contribution to global warming is only a fraction of the damage done by burning a gallon of gasoline: to that add pollution, congestion, accidents, sprawl, and the vehicle-weight-and-horsepower arms races. So we should tax gasoline specifically as well as carbon emissions generically, and fix the resulting distributional issues with annual rebate checks.
Cap and Trade vs. a Carbon TaxBoth good ideas. The differences are more in the optics than in the outcomes.
Cap and Trade vs. a Carbon TaxBoth good ideas. The differences are more in the optics than in the outcomes.
"Steel-wheel interstates"Why not spend some stimulus bucks on freight rail to protect the environment and reduce highway congestion and traffic fatalities?
Human-factors engineering, baby-seat divisionIf 15 to 25 infants die in parked cars every year because their parents forgot there was someone in the baby carseat, than how about redesigning baby carseats?
Just a thought: private jets and airport landing feesNow that "private jet" is the new "welfare queen," how about making them pay market prices to take off and land at major airports?
Obama, Scrooge, and Luxury FeverThe luxury spending of the rich should be regarded as a social drag, not as a contributor to economic stimulus. But it's still pretty Scrooge-like for Paul Krugman to get on Barack Obama's case about taking a nice beach house in Hawai'i for two weeks' vacation between two years of hard work and four or eight years of *really* hard work.
Tom Friedman and public goods for the richFriedman is just silly to suggest that Chinese live better than Americans because they have faster trains. But it's true that making prosperous Americans better off means primarily providing more of the public goods they crave, not increasing their private incomes.
Auto bailout: why hit the workers and not the dealers?A bankruptcy judge can stick it to the workers and the retirees. But the dealers are just as big a problem, and their racket is protected by state laws, which only Congress could sweep away.
Lesley Friedman Rosenthal on arts policyThe arts-policy debate has suffered from a lack of clarity about why public money ought to go to support art-forms that can't pay for themselves out of audience revenues. There are good answers there, but they need to be explicated. (That has long been one of Mike O'Hare's themes.) My long-time friend Lesley Friedman Rosenthal, the General Counsel of Lincoln...
Stimulus, science, and the DemocratsNancy Pelosi wants to spend part of the stimulus money on science. Good!
Dealing with riskGlenn Reynolds admits that some environmental problems justify regulation. Glad to hear it. Now comes the problem of actually designing a system to make the relevant decisions.
What Populism Is NotAre cash grants to all rural residents more "populist" than agricultural subsidies? Only if one mistakenly thinks that populism has something to do with equity.
A populist substitute for farm subsidiesTake away the subsidies to landowners and make per-capita payments, declining slowly, to everyone in the counties where the subsidies used to be paid. There must be something wrong with this, but I'm having a hard time figuring out what it is.
Muzzle all the lobbyists? Not allowed (unfortunately).Mark says we should prohibit the Big Three from lobbying against the public interest. Sadly, that's almost certainly unconstitutional. Simply firing the executives, not so much.
The auto bailout: a plea for ruthlessnessIf there's to be an auto-company bailout, the stockholders and the bondholders ought to take their share of the hit. And the companies should be forbidden to spend any more money buying political influence.
Public programs for the prosperousJust as the private economy has a thriving luxury-goods sector, governments should pay attention to things that rich folks like and that only governments can provide.
Paulson channels Cheney$700 billion worth of absolute and unreviewable power seems rather a lot to entrust to the dying Bush Administration, doesn't it?
The AIG bailout, moral hazard, and regulationThe bailout seems necessary to prevent a full-blown financial panic. More or less wiping out the stockholders is good incentive management. The bondholders, too, should remain at risk. But the counterparties in swaps, and the insurance customers, need to be protected. And now that we have discovered that we need to guarantee swaps, we need to regulate the firms that make them.
AIG, insurance reserves, and the "fool-me-once" principleBailing out AIG with its policyholders' money looks like bad morals and bad policy.
Pharmaceutical marketingIt's worse than wasteful. And $70 billion is a lot of money. It wouldn't be necessary if we made physicians keep up with the literature.
Economic regulation, safety regulation, social insurance, public services, and tortsTo get the benefits of high economic flexibility without the human costs, combine generous provision of public services, a strong social safety net, and tight regulation of conduct that puts health and safety at risk with loose economic regulation and tort reform.
Concerning feasibility"Zero energy consumption" as a national goal is a physical impossibility. "Zero energy imports" as a national goal is an economic, political, and administrative impossibility. Social constraints are no less real than physical constraints. Promising the impossible is a form of lying.
Rent control v. subsidy for long-term residenceRent control has evil results. But long-term residents of a neighborhood contribute to social capital. Why not subsidize them?
"Education for judgment"Barbara Nelson: Policy school "is about balancing goods and bads under uncertainty."
Small priceJohn Boehner's right; there are things worth spending $1 trillion on. Any chance he'll notice that not all of those worthwhile expenditures involve killing people?
"Military spending is free!"Jim Henley points to a journalistic convention with major political and policy consequences: politicians can propose huge amounts of military spending (but not domestic spending or foreign aid) without ever being asked by a reporter who's going to pay for it. And Hilzoy notes a similar convention: "hawkish" equals "serious," no matter how crazy the hawkish opinions actually are.
Why Has Relative Deprivation Always Been a Fringe Concept?Relative deprivation isn't about envy. It's the natural result of the effect of context on evaluation.
Making old, poor smokers pay for children's health careElderly smokers damage their lungs. That's not a good reason to make them pay through the nose.
Do U.S. consumers support world pharmaceutical innovation?Probably. That's not a reason not to try to squeeze down on drug prices, but it is a reason to worry about the effects of that squeeze on innovation.
Bonds instead of filters for spam controlSounds like a good idea. But how is someone with a Yahoo email account supposed to post a bond?
Efficiency, equality, and educationIs the social return on education below the private return? There's reason to think so.
Are our moral intuitions irrelevant?Mark argued this morning (follow-up here) that it is neither irrational nor morally wrong for Americans to place greater weight on the well-being of their fellow citizens than on that of unknown persons abroad when thinking about the desirability of expanded global trade. This observation will draw fire from consequentialist moral philosophers, who insist that the right course of action...
The scope of the moral community: an exchangeAlex Tabarrok and I discuss the tension between overcoming individual selfishness and avoiding the bad consequences of collective selfishness.
Trade and the collective-action problemNo, it's not irrational or morally wrong for Americans to care more about the well-being of other Americans than about the well-being of Belgians, any more than it's irrational or morally wrong for parents to care more for their own children than for other children. Local social capital is valuable, and ought to be tended.
The Maher-Cheney flapMaher owes Cheney an apology. I hate to say it, because I hate to admit that there's anything too mean to say about that sumbitch, but Maher crossed the line.
(Bad) benefit-cost analysis and the HPV vaccineOne more silly argument against (quasi) mandating vaccination for the Human Papilloma Virus.
Price and cost in health care (cont'd)Mike O'Hare is right to insist on the distinction between price and cost. But it's also necessary to distinguish average cost from marginal cost, and that's hard. Health care isn't the only way, or even the best way, to improve health, but getting a handle on health-care finance is essential to creating economic security.
Nice work, if you can get itI love the Hacker plan for healthcare: set up a new federal insurance plan like Medicare which anyone could join, and require employers to either offer equivalent coverage or kick in to that plan. But I can't make the numbers add.
For fossil-fuel taxationGasoline demand is pretty inelastic in the short run, much more elastic in the longer run. And the producers wind up paying some of the tax.
Risk-spreading and the entrepreneurial spiritSocial insurance encourages entrepreneurship by making entrepreneurial failure less personally catastrophic.
Open up the VA health care system?Apparently the VA has figured out how to deliver decent-quality service at reasonable cost. Should we let non-veterans pay for access to the VA health care system?
CAFE Pile-OnI agree with Mark and Mike that CAFE standards are a terrible tool for the goal of reducing global warming. Global warming is caused by burning carbon-based fuels. Therefore, you want to make burning those fuels more expensive. The simplest way to do so, and the way that also raises money for public programs, is a tax on carbon. Period....
The carbon-for-payroll tax tradeA carbon tax is a nice idea substantively. Pairing it with reducing the burden of payroll taxes might even make it palatable politically.
Concerning organizational recklessnessTom Schelling explains the Enron affair, the war in Iraq, and the Foley Follies: an organization may act recklessly not because it's full of reckless people, but because it's so full of cowards that no one dares say, "We can't get away with this."
Why cost-effectiveness is sometimes the wrong decision ruleFederal transit-funding rules embody an elementary blunder in policy analysis: using cost-effectiveness in a situation where there are non-resource costs. The decision to build an elevated rail line to Dulles Airport, rather than tunneling under Tyson's Corner, is an example of how bad analysis leads to bad choices.
The rising cost of K-12 educationThe schools used to get a massive implicit subsidy in the form of women and African-Americans who couldn't get good non-teaching jobs due to employment discrimination. That's gone. To maintain quality is going to cost more money.
Global warming: the case for inactionAs a teaching case, I need a short statement of the case against doing expensive things now to prevent global warming. I've written one up, and am looking for comments as to its accuracy as a statement of the case made by the opponents of taking strong action now.
The Public FiscMark thinks that my public fisc problem can be solved through pay or play. That could be the case, although I have to admit to thinking that employer mandates as a tool for social policy are pretty lousy. There really is no good reason to have health care delivered through private employers in the first place. Not only that, if...
Galt, Kerry, the public fisc, and health care innovationJane Galt corrects me: her plan isn't John Kerry's. And Steve Teles is right: giving health care quality and innovation priority over cost control makes sense only if we can unload the health-care burden from public budgets.
Let 'er Rip on Health Care Spending? I Don't Buy ItJust below, Mark quotes Jane Galt to the effect that "health spending is great! What's the problem?" It might be that, in a pure utility maximization sense, health spending is not a problem (although on this I'm not even sure). But we're not in that pure state. First, a large amount of health care is funded by corporations (albeit subsidized...
Jane Galt asks the right questionWhat do we want to spend our money on that's better than health care?
Too poor to keep breathing?In a market-based society, money conveys lots of advantages. What's wrong with letting money decide who gets kept on life suport and who has the plug pulled? Lots, as it turns out.
Paying for vaccinesIf we rely on the patent system to finance the development of an AIDS vaccine, either the price of the resulting vaccine will be too high, leading to preventable deaths, or the incentive for research will be too low, leading to preventable deaths. Either the vaccine needs to be developed with public money, or we need to offer a huge prize to whoever invents a vaccine. In either case, the medicine can then be sold at is (probably low) marginal cost of production and distribution.
Hedonic pricing and lousy customer serviceJane Galt tells a sad tale about trying to deal with Dell. Doesn't this sort of thing belong in the hedonic price indices?
Spending, saving, happiness, and policy"Jane Galt" channels Robert Frank, without entirely intending to.
"Bioethics" vs. common senseWho could be against a system to match people who need a kidney with people willing to donate one? A bioethicist. Who else?
When are tax cuts for the rich bad even for the rich?When what they lose in public services is more important than what they can buy with the extra cash flow.
Nix the first six update: Negotiated discounts on prescription drugs sounds like a good idea. Bypassing the legislative process to legislate by initiative is generally a bad one.
One more reason The current system gives employers a strong incentive to discriminate against employees with health problems. Wal-Mart has figured that out. Isn't it odd that conservatives make so much of a fuss about moral hazard (which is a real problem, despite Malcolm Gladwell's skepticism) but never seem to have heard of adverse selection?...
The devil in the detailsChester Ford, a second year MPP student at UCLA, explains why my idea about publishing missed-connection data along with on-time performance data probably wouldn't work: To get the information on how many connections are missed included in the delay database would require information on specific passengers. However, the agency charged with collecting the data is not allowed to collect or...
Perverse incentives Dep'tScoring airlines on on-time departures and not on missed connections discourages holding connecting flights. Why hasn't that occurred to someone at the FAA?
GWB, gasoline prices, and demagogyGWB is against "price-gouging." Does he understand that the alternative to rising gasoline prices in the face of a supply shortfall is a physical shortage and either rationing or long lines at the pump? Probably. His cynicism is truly breathtaking.
Defying Mother NatureHow should we treat private decisions to live in the path of predictable natural disasters?
Katrina and global warmingYes, New Orleans is being flooded partly because people drive SUV's. Deal with it.
Thanks for nothing, FCCThe FCC has moved to create a virtual duopoly in high-speed internet access, by deciding that local phone companies don't have to let competing providers such as Earthlink offer service over phone lines. So your choice will be between your phone company and your cable company, which no doubt will, over time, learn to do the collusive-pricing dance without actually...
Housing prices and population growthLow housing prices go along with rapid population growth because low housing prices attract population. No puzzle there.
The TGIF problemAmericans' reluctance to postpone retirement says something about their attitudes toward their work.
Cheap talk dep'tNo, Mr. President, wishing for oil prices to come down isn't really the same as acting to reduce oil prices.
A vaccine against tooth decay?Looks as if it's feasible. I think we should spend the money to get it done.
The battle of the bulge as a policy problemYes, obesity is a complex problem. But complex isn't the same as nonexistent, whatever the fast-food industry flacks pretend.
Tax inheritances as income?Why discriminate against those who earn their money in favor of those who have it handed to them?
Protecting heirs from unearned wealth and slothSome thoughts from Berkeley's Mike O'Hare, stimulated by my earlier reflections on the taxation of inherited wealth: Estate and inheritance taxation I don't think there's any tax so few people pay that so many people don't understand. A few years ago artists were in a major huff because their works were valued at paint-and-canvas only when they donated them to...
Matt Yglesias, Paris Hilton, the Spirit of '76, The estate tax does not force the breakup of family-owned firms and farms, so let's not argue about whether it would be a bad thing if it did.
Notes for a talk on status hierarchy and public policyReducing status inequality looks like a good idea. But can it be done? Would reducing income inequality help?
Does everyone want to pay for high-quality medical care?Focus on health care quality rather than cost? Not a bad idea, if you're prosperous. But if you're poor, money matters more.
"Mortgage interest deduction loophole?" Deducting mortgage interest isn't a loophole; not paying tax on the rent you save by owning a house is.
Regulating advertising to childrenRestricting advertising aimed at children isn't censorship, and liberals should be for it.
Freedom and regulationSarbanes-Oxley and the ADA may be bad policy. But they don't make the country "less free."
Defending the freedom to stealThe Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation think that Sarbanes-Oxley (along with civil rights laws, food and drug labeling, and environmental protection) makes the nation "less free."
Poverty, hunger, and obesityThe poor in America are more likely to be obese than hungry. That invalidates some old liberal concerns and remedies without validating contemporary libertarian heartlessness.
Drug approvals and removals: Why should physicians and patients who know what they're doing be subject to regulations designed to protect those who don't?
More on disaster warningsFederal employees learn about Federal snow days from the radio; the official notification arrives through channels the next day.
Besharov on pre-school programsUniversal preschool is a loser. Targeted nurse home visits are a winner.
Running short on flu vaccineIf we don't throw away lots of flu vaccine each year, we're not buying enough.
(Analytic) sinners in the hands Why boycotting Third World goods is about the nastiest thing you could do to the people who make them.
(Why) is "price gouging" the name of a problem?I thought we believed in free markets. Why is the period after a hurricane an exception?
Consumption taxes in theory and politicsNo, abolishing the IRS isn't a good idea. But a progressive consumption tax still might be.
Unbalanced growth and educational technologyHow can we make the educational sector technologically progressive?
Food, income, and hungerThe world is now producing more than enough food. Hunger results from poverty, not from food shortage.
DeLong on Kerry on health careJohn Kerry wants the federal government to pick up the tab for catastrophic health care costs. Brad DeLong explains why that would be a good idea.
Science, politics, and the public healthReflections on why wealth hasn't bought us more health, and related topics.
Is a new corporate ideologyWhy is employment growing so much more slowly than GDP, and why are wages for the bottom half of the income distribution growing slowly or not at all? I offer some amateur thoughts in search of expert validation in my latest post on The American Street....
Public goods contributions as market signalsLast week I taught my undergraduate class the Mancur Olson model of groups and public goods. [Roughly speaking, if you want selfish people to contribute to public goods (projects that everybody benefits from whether he contributes or not), you need to create some private incentive -- something you don't get if you don't give -- to encourage them. Since political...
Let's not treat low-wage workersKevin Drum would like to see the minimum wage, whose real purchasing power has been badly eaten away by inflation, raised more often and more generously. I think I agree, but it's hard to know without better quantitative models of the low-wage labor markets than we have. In principle, a higher minimum must elminate some marginal jobs, and no one...
Models, predictions, plans, and decisionsDr. Manhattan links to a post by Tim Blair linking to an essay by Michael Crighton. Crighton's lecture is interesting, complex, and cranky (his romanticized view of the scientific process is in flat contradiction to scientific studies of the actual scientific process). Dr. Manhattan, Tim Blair, and especially Tim Blair's commenters all boil it down to the thought (which I...
What's wrong with the Medicare drug plan?A reader writes in to ask whether I can say in detail what's wrong with the Medicare bill. The truthful answer is that, mostly, I can't. That's what Bush & Co. are counting on: that most people won't study the issue closely enough to figure out what's going on. (As Machiavelli advises his Prince, "Many see, but only a few...
What's a great university worth?The State of California owns and operates three of the twenty most important research universities in the United States (UC Berkeley, UC San Diego, and UCLA), one of the great biomedical research centers (UCSF), and two more campuses (Santa Barbara and Irvine) each of which is substantially better in academic terms than the flagship campus of the average state university...
Why don't we charge for rush-hour freeway access?Crowded roads are one of the classic examples of "commons problems." If a good is rival in consumption but its use is unlimited, then it tends to get overused to the point where its value to everyone who uses it is diminished, if not extinguished. The solution is as well known as the problem: charge for use of the scarce...
And which pharmaceuticals has William Safire been using?As Poor Richard could have told William Safire, it's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt. Safire's column today on prescription drug pricing and the issue of re-imports from Canada betrays a pluperfect ignorance of microeconomics. He seems to think that (1) American pharamaceutical manufacturers could collude to raise...
Thomas Schelling and the TitanicDisagreeing with your guru always creates an interesting situation, especially when you back into it unawares. Blogging has been light of late partly because I've been teaching a big undergraduate lecture class: the introductory course in policy analysis. Having 120 students means I can't even pretend to run a discussion, and therefore I've been doing elaborate lecture notes and a...
Back to Bentham? What is the relationship between material wealth and overall well-being? That question is, after more than half a century of being largely excluded from the discourse of academic economics, coming back into fashion. Tibor Scitovsky's The Joyless Economy led the way, but it was so far in advance of its times as to be largely ignored despite the distinction of...