February 07, 2008
BHO and HRC on Cuba
Posted by
Mark Kleiman
There's a difference. Not as large a difference as I would like to see — I'd like to vote for a candidate who says flat-out that the embargo is both a crime and a blunder — but it's in the expected (by me) direction. Obama wants to do some of the right things, and Clinton says that shows how naive he is. Neither is speaking openly about the legal and ethical issues raised by the entanglement of important Miami Cuban politicians and pressure groups (notably CANF) with international and domestic terrorism, but HRC hews firmly to the line preferred by the terrorists while Obama deviates from it.
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
