Lu had to go to Madrid for her interview on her application for a US visa. As it happened, this was on 9/11, and the embassy Stars and Stripes were at half-mast. Less impressively, the State Department continues the fight against the terrorist threat through searching questions on its visa form:
- Do you seek to engage in terrorist activities while in the United States or have you ever engaged in terrorist activities?Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â YES/NO
- Have you ever or do you intend to provide financial assistance or other support to terrorists or terrorist organizations?Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â YES/NO
- Are you a member or representative of a terrorist organization? YES/NO
I bet that scares off al-Baghdadi! Do they really hope to catch idiots like Reid answering â€œyesâ€? I’ve applied for visas from China and Russia, with paranoid and efficient secret police forces, and they didn’t waste my and their time with such questions. The North Koreans don’t ask if you have ever spat on a photo of Kim il Sung. Iran just asks if you are a journalist, have a criminal record or a contagious disease, and where else you have been (read Israel).
The kabuki extends wider than terrorism â€“ but falls well short of a full catalogue of high-profile Dr. Evil crimes. State asks if you are a money launderer, but not a currency forger; a gÃ©nocidaire or torturer, but not a rapist; a procurer of forced abortions, but not a paedophile; a drug smuggler, but not an illegal arms dealer; a prostitute, but not a political consultant mafioso.
What is the mental process behind this? Is it the Al Capone tactic, of getting the bad guy through a technical offence? I don’t see how this would work. Dr Evil lies on his DS-160, flies to New York, tries to plant sarin in the subway, and is arrested. The prosecutor assembles a list of charges adding up to 2,000 years in jail. Would she weaken the media impact by adding the misdemeanour â€œlying on his visa applicationâ€? A similar argument holds for deportation. The false declaration only stands up if Dr. Evil’s substantive misconduct in the USA justifies deportation, in which case the false-declaration charge adds nothing useful.
The only way I can think of to generate this absurd list is an accumulation of random grandstanding by congresspersons of limited understanding. â€œWhat, Mr Under-Secretary, is the State Department doing to stop the entry into this great, pure country of foreigners guilty of the disgusting crime of [insert offence lifted from recent mail from constituent]?â€
Better suggestions welcome.