Archive for August, 2010

August 31st, 2010

It’s a fine idea for unspeakably rich folks to give away some of their swag rather than creating a class of hereditarily unspeakably rich folks. But allowing the unspeakably rich to determine which public purposes will, and won’t, get attention isn’t exactly democratic, is it now?

August 30th, 2010

So it appears. The cost of computing will continue to fall by a factor of 1000 every fifteen years. That means everything keeps changing.

August 30th, 2010

Working in the Executive Office of the President is a great honor, but it’s also a sacrifice in many ways, not least in terms of physical health. I write about this at length at the Stanford University School of Medicine blog today. I hope RBCers will find Stanford’s SCOPE blog of more general interest as [...]

August 28th, 2010

Why won’t the Obama Administration open up scientific research on the medical utility of cannabis?

August 28th, 2010

You mean, MLK *wasn’t* a Communist?

August 28th, 2010

Formal social control – law enforcement and the criminal justice process – controls crime mostly by leveraging informal social control: individual conscience and local norms. Treating offenders with respect turns out to be more than just good manners.

August 28th, 2010

If rude clerks at the DMV “undermine democracy,” then aren’t the cable companies an argument for socialism?

August 28th, 2010

The Financial Reform Act surprisingly includes the long-awaited requirement for natural resource companies to publish what they pay to kleptocrats.

August 28th, 2010

Mark and I have a short piece in Newsweek praising an innovative anti-drunk driving program in South Dakota, which has reduced road deaths and may also be reducing the prison population. You can learn more about the program from the National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime; what I want to add here are the [...]

August 28th, 2010

David Broder has beautiful column today on Glenn Beck. Sometimes the voices of decent moderates are especially powerful, saying: enough.