November 24th, 2009

I’m for it. Let the Republicans in Congress either vote to shut down the Afghan mission or vote to pay for it. I look forward to the debate.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook

6 Responses to ““Pay as you fight””

  1. Tony P. says:

    Mark,

    Is your title an homage to Beardsley Ruml? “Pay as you go” was the slogan for the Ruml plan, introduced during WW2, which instituted income tax withholding.

    –TP

  2. dan says:

    What happened to barry’s promise not to raise our taxes?

  3. College Student says:

    Do you think media coverage in the U.S. is biased? We are looking for people interested in politics to take our Institutional Research Board approved study.

    Many people feel that the media can lead people in different ideological directions. We are Smith College students in a Senior Political Psychology Seminar and we want to invite you to take our survey. We are investigating the relationship between media coverage and political information. If you take our short, confidential survey you can choose to be entered into a raffle for a $50 gift certificate to Amazon.com. If you are interested, follow this link to Surveymonkey.com

    http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=T4JLkCcNbd7TRexboclKxA_3d_3d

    Please help out two college students!!

  4. Bill Nance says:

    You could pay most of the tab for Afghanistan by doing nothing more than trimming all the BS weapon systems development and eliminating a lot of the paper pushing jobs in the Pentagon. We’re spending tens of billions a year just on developing/deploying new weapons systems we’re mot going to need in the foreseeable future. Look at the Zumwalt cruisers for God’s sake. One BILLION each. the navy doesn’t want them, the thing has been showed to be extremely vulnerable and we’re building several anyway thanks to congress.

  5. Brett says:

    You can be for raising taxes to pay for the war (which is what should have been done in the first place), but disagree with the particular proposal in question.

    e’re spending tens of billions a year just on developing/deploying new weapons systems we’re mot going to need in the foreseeable future.

    We’re going to need them if you want an Army that can fight without taking serious casualties in the next decade or two. A lot of our hardware is legacy stuff from the 1980s that’s been retrofitted repeatedly, and it’s getting old.

  6. Barry says:

    dan says:

    “What happened to barry’s promise not to raise our taxes?”

    Hey, you want a war, you gotta pay. *Now* you’ve got something invested in it, doncha?