Archive for October, 2009

October 17th, 2009

It it wrong to require boys to be vaccinated against a disease that does almost all of its damage to women? I can’t see why.

October 17th, 2009

Barack Obama shouldn’t give away the Nobel Peace Prize money. It’s not his money; it’s ours.

October 16th, 2009

Want law enforcement that’s really tough on Mexicans?  Try Mexico’s. Only seven years until accused there are presumed innocent, and meanwhile the cops aren’t afraid to do what’s needed to get the job done. Like lie under oath. Roberto and Layda are students in my shop (Roberto is my PhD advisee), and I am over-the-top [...]

October 16th, 2009

Finding that diminishing lead exposure was the big driver in reducing crime rates doesn’t imply that criminal justice policies don’t matter.

October 16th, 2009

Certain of my colleagues are taking advantage of the current financial crisis of the university by asking whether a big-time competitive athletic program is really central to our educational and research mission.  These people are at best quibblers and whiners, at worst unpatriotic, unAmerican subversive agents (indeed, I know one of them to be an [...]

October 15th, 2009

James Vega’s urgent case for rejecting counterinsurgency in Afghanistan—and the imperial mission that the counterinsurgency model, surprisingly, requires.

October 15th, 2009

Ruminations on social and personal time preference, with an example

October 14th, 2009

William Saletan thinks that pedophilia is sick but that wanting to have sex with pubescent girls is “natural,” and therefore not as wrong. This makes no sense.

October 14th, 2009

If you’re still collecting evidence that a society built on extractive wealth is liable to moral pathology, put this one in your dossier.  The Saudis are demanding that if we use less of their climate-toxic export, we should pay them (and the other oil-exporting countries) for what we don’t buy. Let us pause in awe [...]

October 13th, 2009

Under the heading “Of the Slavery of the Negroes,” Montesquieu writes, “It is impossible for us to suppose these creatures to be men, because, allowing them to be men, a suspicion would follow that we ourselves are not Christians.”