Archive for May, 2009

May 16th, 2009

Who cares how the Pelosi argument comes out. In th meantime, the right wing has what it wants: a distraction from Wilkerson’s explosive charge that Cheney ordered torture as part of his plan to lie us into an unnecessary war.

May 15th, 2009

The proposal is better than nothing, but could easily be improved.

May 14th, 2009

Or at least the Obama Administration is “over” the drug war. The new “Drug Czar” says so.

May 14th, 2009

Two Republicans–Bob Inglis Jeff Flake–and one Democrat, Dan Lipinksi, have just introduced legislation that would seek to reduce global warming by imposing a carbon tax, all of the revenue from which would be used to reduce the payroll tax. It appears that the level at which the tax would be imposed would produce the same [...]

May 14th, 2009

The likely Republican Senate candidate from Arkansas says what he really thinks.

May 14th, 2009

No, the Obama administration did not say that Cheerios is a drug.

May 13th, 2009

The headline of today’s LA Times column, by Max Boot: Obama’s right on target in Afghanistan The president has assembled an impressive military-diplomatic team and strategy that inspires confidence. Somehow, this doesn’t make me feel any better.

May 13th, 2009

No, it’s not a license to cheat. It’s a cognitive capacity, regrettably rare on the current Supreme Bench.

May 13th, 2009

A useful Senate hearing on interrogation. Also, I attempt to uncloud some issues Amy raised about my earlier post on learning to interrogate effectively.

May 13th, 2009

Quincy is clouding the issues here. His post illustrates 3 common problems in this whole interrogation debate: Problem 1: Rushing to the dark corner of the room. My post argued that we need much better evidence about which interrogation methods work better than others. I did not use the word “coercive” for a reason: I [...]