The Reality-Based Community

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  • Home
  • About
  • Cannabis Science & Policy Summit
  • MJ Legalization: The Book
  • BOTEC Analysis
You are here: Home / Palace intrigues

Palace intrigues

September 2, 2008 By James Wimberley

Meanwhile, back in the court of the wittering, dying king, a nasty spat has broken out at the State department. Richard Boucher, the man in charge of the SE Asia desk, and Anne Patterson, the Ambassador to Pakistan, are furious at Zalmay Khalilzad, the UN representative. Apparently Khalilzad, who is close to the Bhutto clan, has been chatting with its current leader, Benazir’s widower Asif Zardari, behind their backs.

A storm in a teacup? Normally it would be; but for two things.

Pakistan is surely the most sensitive country in the world for US diplomacy. It is infested with al-Qaeda and other jihadis; it has nuclear weapons and a history of spreading them around; it is locked in a permanent dispute with its nuclear-armed neighbour India over Kashmir; and has unstable and violent domestic politics. Khalilzad’s little chats are very high-stakes poker. Any cock-up there is worrying. And Khalilzad in particular is Foggy Bottom’s Red Adair, the guy they send in to put out the fires left by neocon idiots like Paul Bremer in Iraq and John Bolton at the UN.

Far more important is the fact of the leak that made the cock-up public knowledge. Whoever did this – and I would bet some mischief-making political appointee rather than the principals, who are senior career diplomats, professional survivors of the Bush years – has achieved several things:

* discrediting Khalilzad and to a lesser extent Boucher and Patterson;

* making it that much less likely that opposition politicians around the world will talk frankly to US diplomats;

* putting Asif Zardaris’s prospects and even his life at greater risk.

Nice work. Perhaps it was a coup by Iranian intelligence? But who could tell the difference?

I question the judgement of NYT reporters Helene Cooper and Mark Mazzetti in going with a story that has little news value and damages US interests quite a lot. As so often with this Administration, reporters have been played by intriguing insiders. At least now they should go after the story of the leak.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Diplomacy, Wayward press

Popular Posts of the Week

  • Advice to Alex M
  • There’s ordinary genius. Then there’s this video
  • The Secret Dubbing of Audrey Hepburn in My Fair Lady
  • “I take it the answer is: ‘No comment’?”
  • Witnessing Violence and Death: What Happens to People and How Can They Be Helped?

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • The Belgravia Dispatch
  • Brad DeLong
  • Cop in the ‘hood
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • Firedoglake
  • A Fistful of Euros
  • Healthinsurance.org Blog
  • Horizons
  • How Appealing
  • The Incidental Economist
  • Informed Comment — Juan Cole
  • Jonathan Bernstein
  • Kevin Drum
  • Marginal Revolution – Tyler Cowen
  • Marijuana Monitor
  • The Moderate Voice
  • Obsidian Wings
  • Patheos
  • Philosoraptor
  • Plato o Plomo – Alejandro Hope
  • Political Animal
  • Politics Upside Down
  • Progressive Blog Digest
  • Progressive Blue
  • Slacktivist
  • Snopes
  • Strange Doctrines
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Volokh Conspiracy (Washington Post)
  • Vox Pop

Recent Posts

  • Television Was Not Always a Vast Wasteland
  • Home
  • “I take it the answer is: ‘No comment’?”
  • There’s ordinary genius. Then there’s this video
  • The libertine’s one-way ticket from Prague

Archives

Topic Areas

Copyright © 2017 The Reality-Based Community  •  Designed & Developed by ReadyMadeWeb LLC