June 5th, 2006

There’s an old joke about a man who was came to a question on a visa application form that asked whether he supported “the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence.” He replied: “Violence.”

The Rumsfeld Defense Department seems to have the same idea. Confronted with the question of whether to obey the McCain Amendment’s ban on “cruel, inhuman, or degrading” treatment of prisoners, they’ve opted for “degrading.”

Where’s Senator Straight Talk in all this? Is he content to have written civilized behavior into the statute books without reference to whether it takes place in the field? Bush’s “signing statement” was virtually an open declaration that BushCo intended to violate the law anytime they wanted to. Yet the Senator seems unperturbed.

No, impeachment isn’t good enough. We need war crimes trials.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook

7 Responses to “Multiple choice”

  1. Sarah says:

    Dream on. We won’t even get impeachment. The man is made of case-hardened alloy.

  2. KCinDC says:

    It’s not that Bush is made of case-hardened alloy, but that his opponents in both parties are made of tapioca.

  3. James Wimberley says:

    Why are war crimes trials a dream? Torture and conspiracy to torture are straightforward crimes in US law. A future Democratic administration would have to investigate them seriously – by someone like Fitzgerald, not Pat Roberts – with a view to prosecution. The alternative would be to lose all moral credibility by issuing a blanket amnesty. This won’t go away; look at Pinochet.

  4. Mike Kelley says:

    It’s worth a try. Notice that Kissinger has to stay out of Europe these days. Most of the demos are too corrupt and/or frightened to stand up on their hind legs and bray. But dare we even impeach? Can you say unelected President Cheney? Can we go for a two-fer? But look at the list of succession. Who along that list would you prefer? When could we stop throwing the bums out? And who in hell is the right dem to take over? Nothing but also rans, no ways and retreads there. Do we honestly think that our heartland will elect Hillary? Do we just demand defeat, even when victory hovers? Will we just throw this one away like we did the last two?

  5. cf The new rightwing blogosphere talking point that Al Gore is a twit for saying that China has higher emissions control standards than the US because everyone knows that no-one in China enforces laws, unlike the US where the law matters because it is actually enforced.

  6. BroD says:

    No, impeachment isn’t good enough–but it’s a start.

  7. Jay C says:

    Impeachment?
    Censure?
    Sense-of-the-Congress resolutions?
    Not [deleted] likely – even the Adminstration’s ostensible “opposition” can barely bring itself to even speak harshly about this embarrassment of a President, or any of the regime’s shortcomings, still less abuses. Disgraceful (and yes, that’s both Bush and the Dems!)