<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The optimist sees the donut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/the-wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/</link>
	<description>Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27336</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 23:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27336</guid>
		<description>And if they try to quickly patch the donut hole, it&#039;ll drive up the defecit and probably drive up interest rates, thus gutting the value of seniors&#039; bond holdings.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if they try to quickly patch the donut hole, it&#8217;ll drive up the defecit and probably drive up interest rates, thus gutting the value of seniors&#8217; bond holdings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatbear</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27335</link>
		<dc:creator>fatbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 22:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27335</guid>
		<description>The question is not how many seniors will get hit, but how many (a dozen or so is all that&#039;s needed) get national press coverage for being denied (even temporarily) life-saving drugs.  Think Terri Schiavo, except in reverse.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is not how many seniors will get hit, but how many (a dozen or so is all that&#8217;s needed) get national press coverage for being denied (even temporarily) life-saving drugs.  Think Terri Schiavo, except in reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Galt</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27334</guid>
		<description>Ummm . . . it seems to me that before the &quot;donut hole&quot; hits, all those seniors will have had six months of the government paying for their prescriptions.  If they&#039;re paying $400 a month, that&#039;s $2400 in their pockets that they didn&#039;t have before.  It&#039;s not clear to me that the political NPV is negative here--particularly since there are a lot of seniors who don&#039;t spend more than $2400 a year on drugs, and a lot more who spend an even huger amount, and get almost all of it covered.  No doubt the Republicans will take a small hit from the donut hole . . . but it seems to me that they&#039;ll probably get a big plus for the drug payments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm . . . it seems to me that before the &#8220;donut hole&#8221; hits, all those seniors will have had six months of the government paying for their prescriptions.  If they&#8217;re paying $400 a month, that&#8217;s $2400 in their pockets that they didn&#8217;t have before.  It&#8217;s not clear to me that the political NPV is negative here&#8211;particularly since there are a lot of seniors who don&#8217;t spend more than $2400 a year on drugs, and a lot more who spend an even huger amount, and get almost all of it covered.  No doubt the Republicans will take a small hit from the donut hole . . . but it seems to me that they&#8217;ll probably get a big plus for the drug payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27333</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27333</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can&#039;t see how to attribute this to any sort of bias on the part of the Times or its reporters. ************Even if I thought that the Times management was as willing to go into the tank for Bush as the management of the Washington Post*************, I can&#039;t see how omitting the key operational fact now would serve any purpose. (Omitting that fact when the plan was before the Congress was a different story.)&quot;  (emphasis added)
Uh, Bush&#039;s Voodoo II economics, the Iraq War, Swift Liars, the list goes on.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t see how to attribute this to any sort of bias on the part of the Times or its reporters. ************Even if I thought that the Times management was as willing to go into the tank for Bush as the management of the Washington Post*************, I can&#8217;t see how omitting the key operational fact now would serve any purpose. (Omitting that fact when the plan was before the Congress was a different story.)&#8221;  (emphasis added)<br />
Uh, Bush&#8217;s Voodoo II economics, the Iraq War, Swift Liars, the list goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weigel</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27332</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27332</guid>
		<description>The doughnut hole is not a problem.  It&#039;s an opportunity.  In October, when a goodly number of seniors hit the hole and sob stories hit Dateline NBC and 60 Minutes, Congress will break from its recess in a grand show of compassion and rush back into session.  Congressmen will fill the hole with general fund money, and return home to their districts as heroes.
Message: they care.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The doughnut hole is not a problem.  It&#8217;s an opportunity.  In October, when a goodly number of seniors hit the hole and sob stories hit Dateline NBC and 60 Minutes, Congress will break from its recess in a grand show of compassion and rush back into session.  Congressmen will fill the hole with general fund money, and return home to their districts as heroes.<br />
Message: they care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmh</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27331</link>
		<dc:creator>dmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27331</guid>
		<description>I had the same reaction and went back to see the byline.  Sure enough, in their utter folly the Times editors published a Part D story without having Bob Pear reporting it.  It is not merely a case of the newspaper not knowing the details but a newspaper not consulting its own reporter who certainly knows about the donut hole and who probably knows more about Part D than any reporter in the country.  What could they possibly be thinking?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same reaction and went back to see the byline.  Sure enough, in their utter folly the Times editors published a Part D story without having Bob Pear reporting it.  It is not merely a case of the newspaper not knowing the details but a newspaper not consulting its own reporter who certainly knows about the donut hole and who probably knows more about Part D than any reporter in the country.  What could they possibly be thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serial catowner</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/wayward-press/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/comment-page-1/#comment-27330</link>
		<dc:creator>serial catowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/the-optimist-sees-the-donut/#comment-27330</guid>
		<description>I used to watch the people ahead of me in line pay for their prescriptions.  I would guess the average amount I saw (which obviously has no statistical validity) was over $300.
So I&#039;m guessing &#039;donut hole time&#039; will be about the middle of October.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to watch the people ahead of me in line pay for their prescriptions.  I would guess the average amount I saw (which obviously has no statistical validity) was over $300.<br />
So I&#8217;m guessing &#8216;donut hole time&#8217; will be about the middle of October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

