<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Cook:  Republicans face an &#8220;intensity gap&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/campaigns/campaign-2006/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/uncategorized/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/</link>
	<description>Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/uncategorized/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-25917</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/#comment-25917</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just amazing to me that in 12 short years the Republicans have acquired all of the most unattractive characteristics of a long-held legislative majority that it took the Democrats 40 years to perfect.  Maybe things really are speeded up these days.  If the Dems take over in &#039;06, maybe by &#039;12 they&#039;ll be as corrupt and complacent as the Repubs are now and as the Dems were in &#039;92.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just amazing to me that in 12 short years the Republicans have acquired all of the most unattractive characteristics of a long-held legislative majority that it took the Democrats 40 years to perfect.  Maybe things really are speeded up these days.  If the Dems take over in &#8217;06, maybe by &#8217;12 they&#8217;ll be as corrupt and complacent as the Repubs are now and as the Dems were in &#8217;92.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bulger</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2006/05/uncategorized/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-25916</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bulger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/05/uncategorized/charlie-cook-republicans-face-an-intensity-gap/#comment-25916</guid>
		<description>All well and good, but is there a time of year when these polls mean less than they do now?  It&#039;s 6 months to election day, and a lot can happen - to gasoline prices, in particular - in that span of time.  If the price of oil decreases significantly before November, look for the inevitable Republican rebound and another two years of one-party rule.
A &quot;voter turnout problem&quot; in the month of May is not something worth worrying about.
The poll itself is particularly meaningless.  Don&#039;t Democrats always do well in the generic &quot;which party would you vote for&quot; question?  When it comes to crunch time, and voters are faced with real names on real ballots, the numbers are likely to change significantly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All well and good, but is there a time of year when these polls mean less than they do now?  It&#8217;s 6 months to election day, and a lot can happen &#8211; to gasoline prices, in particular &#8211; in that span of time.  If the price of oil decreases significantly before November, look for the inevitable Republican rebound and another two years of one-party rule.<br />
A &#8220;voter turnout problem&#8221; in the month of May is not something worth worrying about.<br />
The poll itself is particularly meaningless.  Don&#8217;t Democrats always do well in the generic &#8220;which party would you vote for&#8221; question?  When it comes to crunch time, and voters are faced with real names on real ballots, the numbers are likely to change significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

