http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/ Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:22:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24092 Cryptic Ned Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:57:57 +0000 http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/04/uncategorized/in-defense-of-leaking/#comment-24092 Consider this: If you asked all Americans, "Should the president lie in order to defend the country?" I think the vast majority would say yes. I don't think this will change the mind of anyone who still thinks for whatever reason that "defending the country" required the invasion of Iraq. Consider this:
If you asked all Americans, “Should the president lie in order to defend the country?” I think the vast majority would say yes.
I don’t think this will change the mind of anyone who still thinks for whatever reason that “defending the country” required the invasion of Iraq.

]]> http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24091 pgl Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:24:56 +0000 http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/04/uncategorized/in-defense-of-leaking/#comment-24091 "I rest my case" = QED. Well done! “I rest my case” = QED. Well done!

]]> http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24090 norbizness Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:40:36 +0000 http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/04/uncategorized/in-defense-of-leaking/#comment-24090 "Mr. Hutz, are you aware that you're not wearing any pants?" “Mr. Hutz, are you aware that you’re not wearing any pants?”

]]> http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24089 quiddity Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:36:34 +0000 http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/04/uncategorized/in-defense-of-leaking/#comment-24089 That's a solid report that cannot be ignored. Goes nicely with the January intel conclusion saying no Niger deal, followed by Bush's SOTU "yellowcake". Two really clear instances of lying that are pre- and post- invasion. As much as I doubted it would happen, Bush may fall further in the polls. That’s a solid report that cannot be ignored. Goes nicely with the January intel conclusion saying no Niger deal, followed by Bush’s SOTU “yellowcake”. Two really clear instances of lying that are pre- and post- invasion.
As much as I doubted it would happen, Bush may fall further in the polls.

]]> http://www.samefacts.com/2006/04/secrecy-in-government/in-defense-of-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-24088 quiddity Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:18:19 +0000 http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2006/04/uncategorized/in-defense-of-leaking/#comment-24088 That's a solid report that cannot be ignored. Goes nicely with the January intel conclusion saying no Niger deal, followed by Bush's SOTU "yellowcake". Two really clear instances of lying that are pre- and post- invasion. As much as I doubted it would happen, Bush may fall further in the polls. That’s a solid report that cannot be ignored. Goes nicely with the January intel conclusion saying no Niger deal, followed by Bush’s SOTU “yellowcake”. Two really clear instances of lying that are pre- and post- invasion.
As much as I doubted it would happen, Bush may fall further in the polls.

]]>