The Reality-Based Community

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  • Home
  • About
  • Cannabis Science & Policy Summit
  • MJ Legalization: The Book
  • BOTEC Analysis
You are here: Home / Secrets and lies

Secrets and lies

April 8, 2006 By Mark Kleiman @markarkleiman

Tom Maguire makes a point which he correctly says is obvious: when George W. Bush says that he’s against leaks of classified information, he means that he’s against the revelation of information that might damage him politically.

Right. Obvious. But obvious to whom?

You and Tom and I knew all that. But of course the public, and in particular the Fox-News-viewing public, didn’t. A substantial chunk of the voters took seriously the idea that the President was opposed to leaks of classified material because having that material known might damage the national security.

If the information helps Bush politically, he’s happy to have it out there, even if that means being sloppy about procedures and dishonestly selective in the choice of what gets released. When Libby leaked the information in that NIE to Judith Miller, the document was still stamped “Secret,” which meant that anyone else who discussed it would have been violating an Executive Order and possibly (in the Bush interpretation) violating the law. Libby told Miller that the National Intelligence Estimate reported the Niger-yellowcake story as a “key judgment,”which it didn’t, and Libby failed to mention parts of the Estimate that cast doubt on the Niger story. Of course he also didn’t mention a subsequent report from the National Intelligence Council that completely trashed the Niger fantasy.

So, on the Bush theory that underlies the Franklin prosecution and the criminal investigation into the leak about the NSA’s warrantless-wiretapping program, it was lawful for Libby to deceive reporters, but would have been a felony for anyone else to set them straight. (Of course Miller wanted to be deceived, but that’s a different problem.)

Again, I’m agreeing with Tom here: there’s nothing in the latest revelation that ought to change the mind of anyone who’s been paying attention. But, with any luck, tens of millions of people who have not been paying attention up until now will learn from this how bogus Bush’s commitment to keeping the secrets turns out to be.

[Some earlier reflections on the abuse of the classification system, and why criminalizing leaks of secrets is a bad idea.]

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Popular Posts of the Week

  • There’s ordinary genius. Then there’s this video
  • Advice to Alex M
  • The libertine’s one-way ticket from Prague
  • The Secret Dubbing of Audrey Hepburn in My Fair Lady
  • Witnessing Violence and Death: What Happens to People and How Can They Be Helped?

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • The Belgravia Dispatch
  • Brad DeLong
  • Cop in the ‘hood
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • Firedoglake
  • A Fistful of Euros
  • Healthinsurance.org Blog
  • Horizons
  • How Appealing
  • The Incidental Economist
  • Informed Comment — Juan Cole
  • Jonathan Bernstein
  • Kevin Drum
  • Marginal Revolution – Tyler Cowen
  • Marijuana Monitor
  • The Moderate Voice
  • Obsidian Wings
  • Patheos
  • Philosoraptor
  • Plato o Plomo – Alejandro Hope
  • Political Animal
  • Politics Upside Down
  • Progressive Blog Digest
  • Progressive Blue
  • Slacktivist
  • Snopes
  • Strange Doctrines
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Volokh Conspiracy (Washington Post)
  • Vox Pop

Recent Posts

  • “I take it the answer is: ‘No comment’?”
  • There’s ordinary genius. Then there’s this video
  • The libertine’s one-way ticket from Prague
  • Recommended reading on Brexit and the Future of the EU
  • Cannabis News Round-Up

Archives

Topic Areas

Copyright © 2017 The Reality-Based Community  •  Designed & Developed by ReadyMadeWeb LLC