The Reality-Based Community

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  • Home
  • About
  • BOTEC Analysis
You are here: Home / Wal-Mart: Theft or union-busting?

Wal-Mart: Theft or union-busting?

April 8, 2005 By Mark Kleiman @markarkleiman

It’s hard to tell whether the former #2 executive at Wal-Mart was, as he claims, running a secret and illegal program of making cash payments to interfere with union organizing drives, or, as the company claims, pretending that he was running such a program to cover up thefts from the company.

Assume for the moment that the company’s story is the correct one. What that tells us is that, the notion that the #2 executive was running a secret and illegal program of making cash payments to interfere with union organizing drives was sufficiently plausible within the Wal-Mart corporate culture that the executive (1) chose that — as opposed, say, to political contributions — as his cover story and (2) was able to persuade subordinates of the truth of that story.

You can, if you like, choose to believe that those cultural facts about Wal-Mart might be true in a world in which, in fact, Wal-Mart was doing nothing illegal to smash unions. If you believe that, may I interest you in a dozen bottles of Dr. Kleiman’s Patented Snake Oil, guaranteed to cure whatever ails you?

The Wall Street Journal, from behind its subscription barrier, reports that the 31-year-old executive who blew the whistle on Coughlin has been fired. Coughlin, of course, was allowed to resign.

Is that proof of the company’s guilt? No. But it sure changes the odds, doesn’t it?

One other fact stands out: Coughlin, who was earning (in some extended sense of that term) $6 million a year from Wal-Mart, is accused of stealing something between $100,000 and $500,000, all of it in merchandise rather than cash. Yes, it’s possible he’s just the sort of petty crook who gets off on having his $1300 hornback alligator skin boots paid for by his employer under a phony invoice. But it seems more natural to believe that Coughlin was in fact reimbursing himself for what he thought were legitimate, if illegal, corporate expenses.

Wal-Mart has no doubt done marvellous things for American consumers and for Chinese workers. But I think I’ll keep shopping at Costco.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Crime Control

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • The Belgravia Dispatch
  • Brad DeLong
  • Cop in the ‘hood
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • Firedoglake
  • A Fistful of Euros
  • Healthinsurance.org Blog
  • Horizons
  • How Appealing
  • The Incidental Economist
  • Informed Comment — Juan Cole
  • Jonathan Bernstein
  • Kevin Drum
  • Marginal Revolution — Tyler Cowen
  • Marijuana Monitor
  • The Moderate Voice
  • Obsidian Wings
  • Patheos
  • Philosoraptor
  • Plato o Plomo — Alejandro Hope
  • Political Animal
  • Politics Upside Down
  • Progressive Blog Digest
  • Progressive Blue
  • Slacktivist
  • Snopes
  • Strange Doctrines
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Volokh Conspiracy (Washington Post)
  • Vox Pop

Recent Posts

  • Sex, the Secretary, and Starr
  • Cannabis News Round-Up
  • Percentages and the pastrami panic…
  • Do professors care whether college students are actually learning?
  • Cannabis News Round-Up

Archives

Topic Areas

Copyright © 2017 The Reality-Based Community  •  Designed & Developed by ReadyMadeWeb LLC