<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dred Scott&#8221; means &#8220;Roe v. Wade&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samefacts.com/2004/10/election-2004/dred-scott-means-roe-v-wade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2004/10/uncategorized/dred-scott-means-roe-v-wade/</link>
	<description>Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyers, Guns and Money</title>
		<link>http://www.samefacts.com/2004/10/uncategorized/dred-scott-means-roe-v-wade/comment-page-1/#comment-20047</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyers, Guns and Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 06:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samefacts.dreamhosters.com/2004/10/uncategorized/dred-scott-means-roe-v-wade/#comment-20047</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dred Scott, abortion, and originalism&lt;/strong&gt;

Paperwight and Mark Kleiman are, of course, correct: the President&#039;s bizarre invocation of Dred Scott is about abortion. Lest you think this is a reach, let&#039;s turn it over to Nino, in his dissent in Stenberg v. Carhart...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dred Scott, abortion, and originalism</strong></p>
<p>Paperwight and Mark Kleiman are, of course, correct: the President&#8217;s bizarre invocation of Dred Scott is about abortion. Lest you think this is a reach, let&#8217;s turn it over to Nino, in his dissent in Stenberg v. Carhart&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

