The Reality-Based Community

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

  • Home
  • About
  • Cannabis Science & Policy Summit
  • MJ Legalization: The Book
  • BOTEC Analysis
You are here: Home / Have the Democrats learned to hit back?

Have the Democrats learned to hit back?

April 28, 2004 By Mark Kleiman @markarkleiman

Looks as if the decision by Team Bush to go after Kerry’s military record might have been a mistake. (Though no one has yet used what I thought was the obvious counter-snark: “Well, at least we know George W. Bush didn’t toss any of his medals.” Update: Wrong! See below.)

Prizes for Best Counterattack So Far go to:

Wes Clark, writing in in the New York Times, who points out the inconsistency between Grant Hubbard’s current account of Kerry’s conduct and the efficiency reports Hubbard signed when Kerry was actually serving under him, and then says of Bush and Cheney “I believe those who didn’t serve, or didn’t show up for service, should have the decency to respect those who did serve,”

and

Frank Lautenberg on the Senate floor, saying of Dick Cheney that he had “the shriek of a hawk but the backbone of a chicken.” (Query: Is there any probability that Lautenberg knows what “chickenhawk” meant after it stopped referring to a bird and before it started meaning someone eager to shed other people’s blood in war but not his own?) Note that the AP gives Bush and Cheney a break by reporting they they haven’t personally attacked Kerry’s service record, ignoring the attacks by their many surrogates.

The next step in the campaign should be to get reporters to start asking at the daily press gaggle why “all” of Bush’s records didn’t include some choice items: for example, the record of the Flight Inquiry Board that must have been convened when he decided not to show up for his annual flight physical or the tax documents that would allow a calculation of how many days he actually served and got paid for in 1972 and 1973.

Correction of a previous error: I’ve been asking why Bush’s discharge papers (Form DD-214), and the associated separation codes, which give the reasons for the separation, haven’t been released. Lt. Smash informs me that DD-214s are issued only on leaving active duty, so a reservist wouldn’t have gotten one. My bad.

Update: I’m told that Jay Leno snarked the snark I claimed was yet unsnarked:

“President Bush’s campaign is now attacking John Kerry for throwing away some of his medals to protest the Vietnam War. Bush did not have any medals to throw away, but in his defense he did have all his services records thrown out.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Popular Posts of the Week

  • Advice to Alex M
  • Unlearning How White People Ask Personal Questions
  • Television Was Not Always a Vast Wasteland
  • The Secret Dubbing of Audrey Hepburn in My Fair Lady
  • Witnessing Violence and Death: What Happens to People and How Can They Be Helped?

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • The Belgravia Dispatch
  • Brad DeLong
  • Cop in the ‘hood
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Echidne of the Snakes
  • Firedoglake
  • A Fistful of Euros
  • Healthinsurance.org Blog
  • Horizons
  • How Appealing
  • The Incidental Economist
  • Informed Comment — Juan Cole
  • Jonathan Bernstein
  • Kevin Drum
  • Marginal Revolution – Tyler Cowen
  • Marijuana Monitor
  • The Moderate Voice
  • Obsidian Wings
  • Patheos
  • Philosoraptor
  • Plato o Plomo – Alejandro Hope
  • Political Animal
  • Politics Upside Down
  • Progressive Blog Digest
  • Progressive Blue
  • Slacktivist
  • Snopes
  • Strange Doctrines
  • Ta-Nehisi Coates
  • The Volokh Conspiracy (Washington Post)
  • Vox Pop

Recent Posts

  • Television Was Not Always a Vast Wasteland
  • Home
  • “I take it the answer is: ‘No comment’?”
  • There’s ordinary genius. Then there’s this video
  • The libertine’s one-way ticket from Prague

Archives

Topic Areas

Copyright © 2017 The Reality-Based Community  •  Designed & Developed by ReadyMadeWeb LLC